語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Blended learning vs. traditional ins...
~
Murray, Anthony.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Blended learning vs. traditional instruction as a predictor of student achievement in New York City public schools.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Blended learning vs. traditional instruction as a predictor of student achievement in New York City public schools./
作者:
Murray, Anthony.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
88 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-09A(E).
標題:
Instructional design. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10594741
ISBN:
9781369749526
Blended learning vs. traditional instruction as a predictor of student achievement in New York City public schools.
Murray, Anthony.
Blended learning vs. traditional instruction as a predictor of student achievement in New York City public schools.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 88 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ed.D.)--St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services, 2017.
This study explored the differences in student achievement on New York State standardized tests between blended learning and traditional instructional methodologies. Specifically, the study compared student achievement in iLearnNYC schools, to their peer schools that deliver instruction in a traditional manner. iLearnNYC is a blended learning program where online content complements in-class teaching and allows students more control over the pace in which they learn, where they learn, and what they learn. A quasi-experimental quantitative design was used to analyze test scores on the June 2014 and June 2015 administration of the New York State Common Core Algebra I exams (Appendix B & C) for both the blended learning and the traditional learning groups. Statistical analyses was performed on the data to determine the differences in students' mean scores, as well as differences in achievement levels for various sub-groups of the sample. The study found that students in the Blended Learning group (iLearnNYC schools) did not have statistically significant greater mean scores in overall performance on Common Core Algebra I Regents exam than their peers in the Traditional Learning group (peer schools). This study also found that Students with Disability (SWD's) in the traditional learning group significantly outperformed their counterparts in the blended learning group. Additionally, there was not a significant difference for English Language Learners (ELLS) between the blended learning and the traditional groups.
ISBN: 9781369749526Subjects--Topical Terms:
3172279
Instructional design.
Blended learning vs. traditional instruction as a predictor of student achievement in New York City public schools.
LDR
:03121nmm a2200313 4500
001
2123916
005
20171010112655.5
008
180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781369749526
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10594741
035
$a
AAI10594741
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Murray, Anthony.
$3
3285867
245
1 0
$a
Blended learning vs. traditional instruction as a predictor of student achievement in New York City public schools.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
88 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: James Campbell.
502
$a
Thesis (Ed.D.)--St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services, 2017.
520
$a
This study explored the differences in student achievement on New York State standardized tests between blended learning and traditional instructional methodologies. Specifically, the study compared student achievement in iLearnNYC schools, to their peer schools that deliver instruction in a traditional manner. iLearnNYC is a blended learning program where online content complements in-class teaching and allows students more control over the pace in which they learn, where they learn, and what they learn. A quasi-experimental quantitative design was used to analyze test scores on the June 2014 and June 2015 administration of the New York State Common Core Algebra I exams (Appendix B & C) for both the blended learning and the traditional learning groups. Statistical analyses was performed on the data to determine the differences in students' mean scores, as well as differences in achievement levels for various sub-groups of the sample. The study found that students in the Blended Learning group (iLearnNYC schools) did not have statistically significant greater mean scores in overall performance on Common Core Algebra I Regents exam than their peers in the Traditional Learning group (peer schools). This study also found that Students with Disability (SWD's) in the traditional learning group significantly outperformed their counterparts in the blended learning group. Additionally, there was not a significant difference for English Language Learners (ELLS) between the blended learning and the traditional groups.
520
$a
This study concludes that other variables such as students' prior academic results, students' attendance, and teachers' experience should be considered if blended learning is to be used as a comprehensive school reform model to increase students' overall performance on state standardized math exams. Transitioning from a traditional to a blended model can produce many challenges. These challenges can relate primarily to faculty and learner time; level of effort; familiarity, skill, and comfort-level with online platform (Lotrecchiano et al., 2013).
590
$a
School code: 1334.
650
4
$a
Instructional design.
$3
3172279
650
4
$a
Educational technology.
$3
517670
650
4
$a
Mathematics education.
$3
641129
690
$a
0447
690
$a
0710
690
$a
0280
710
2
$a
St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services.
$3
1251163
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-09A(E).
790
$a
1334
791
$a
Ed.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10594741
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9334528
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入