東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Improving Special Education Outcomes...

Wolford, Barbara.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Improving Special Education Outcomes through Policy, Teacher Practice, and Student Support: A Qualitative Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Improving Special Education Outcomes through Policy, Teacher Practice, and Student Support: A Qualitative Study./
作者:	Wolford, Barbara.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	186 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08A(E).
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10259582
ISBN:	9781369637540

Improving Special Education Outcomes through Policy, Teacher Practice, and Student Support: A Qualitative Study.
Wolford, Barbara.

Improving Special Education Outcomes through Policy, Teacher Practice, and Student Support: A Qualitative Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 186 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Brandman University, 2017.

Purpose: The purpose of this grounded theory qualitative study was to discover the perceptions of special education directors regarding the changes in special education at the policy level, teacher practice level, and student support level necessary to improve the academic achievement of students with disabilities in California.

ISBN: 9781369637540Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.

Improving Special Education Outcomes through Policy, Teacher Practice, and Student Support: A Qualitative Study.
LDR:03513nmm a2200337 4500 001 2123825
005 20171010112651.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369637540
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10259582
035 $a AAI10259582
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wolford, Barbara. $3 3285770
245 1 0 $a Improving Special Education Outcomes through Policy, Teacher Practice, and Student Support: A Qualitative Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 186 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Philip O. Pendley.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Brandman University, 2017.
520 $a Purpose: The purpose of this grounded theory qualitative study was to discover the perceptions of special education directors regarding the changes in special education at the policy level, teacher practice level, and student support level necessary to improve the academic achievement of students with disabilities in California.
520 $a Methodology: The study employed an emergent approach to grounded theory. Grounded theory utilizes a homogenous sample of participants with similar backgrounds and experiences to allow for theory development. A series of face-to-face and phone recorded structured interviews addressing the research questions were conducted. The researcher transcribed and coded the interviews for emergent themes which answered the research questions and addressed the problem.
520 $a Findings: Research Sub-Question 1 generated four policy related interview questions and four major themes emerged from the questions: (a) the topics of funding; (b) due process; (c) decision-making; and (d) SELPA governance. Research Sub-Question 2 prompted the directors to describe five major themes for the teacher practice level: (a) nothing eliminated, (b) inclusion, (c) teacher preparation, (d) professional development, and (e) CDE compliance monitoring. Research Sub-Question 3 focused on the student support level and elicited the response that supplementary aids and services are dependent on individual needs. Two major themes emerged from this section: (a) interventions, and (b) credentialing.
520 $a Conclusions: The major conclusions of the study are funding for special education is inadequate, current teacher preparation programs in California are not meeting the needs of special education directors, inclusion of special education students and teachers is still developing, and teachers need on-going relent professional development.
520 $a Recommendations: During the re-authorization of IDEA discussion regarding the funding mechanism need to occur to ensure that the funding mechanism positively impacts states to provide for local contributions and inclusion at the state level. Administrators as well as general and special education teachers need to know how to collaborative, accommodate, differentiate and support the learning process for all students. For current teachers offer the courses as a certificate in inclusive education or as part of a master's degree. Embed an overview of the different disabilities in the mild to moderate program and eliminate the current added authorizations.
590 $a School code: 1772.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Brandman University. $b School of Education. $3 3174521
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08A(E).
790 $a 1772
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10259582