東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Blended Technology Rich Instruction ...

Puccetti, Gregory Peter.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Blended Technology Rich Instruction Verses Blended Computer Managed Instruction in 8th Grade Digital Literacy Instruction.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Blended Technology Rich Instruction Verses Blended Computer Managed Instruction in 8th Grade Digital Literacy Instruction./
作者:	Puccetti, Gregory Peter.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	112 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-03A(E).
標題:	Educational technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10149966
ISBN:	9781369050622

Blended Technology Rich Instruction Verses Blended Computer Managed Instruction in 8th Grade Digital Literacy Instruction.
Puccetti, Gregory Peter.

Blended Technology Rich Instruction Verses Blended Computer Managed Instruction in 8th Grade Digital Literacy Instruction. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 112 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2017.

Blended learning research is becoming increasingly popular at the K-12 level; however, past research has focused primarily on post-secondary learning environments. Additionally, while much research has focused on comparisons between online and blended learning to traditional learning, few studies have focused on comparisons between different models of blended learning. Little research has been found that compares learning outcomes between two different blended learning styles in the area of middle school digital literacy. Therefore, it is not known if students taking an 8th grade computer class score significantly better on a standardized digital literacy test when utilizing a computer mediated instruction (CMI) software program like EasyTech in a blended learning environment than those who did not utilize the EasyTech software in a similar blended learning environment. Additionally, it is not known if the independent variables of race, gender, or socioeconomic status (SES) have any effect on the outcome. The purpose of this ex post facto causal comparative study was to compare digital literacy achievement test scores of 8th grade students in a computer class being taught in a blended CMI learning environment utilizing EasyTech software to 8th grade students in a computer class who were taught in a blended learning environment without utilizing EasyTech software. This study utilized data from 3622 8th grade students from a large diverse urban school district that have taken a digital literacy class and a digital literacy assessment. The student data and test scores were drawn from the school district's student information service (SIS). The independent variables were race, gender, SES, and post-test scores. The dependent variable was the type of blended learning environment, classes taught utilizing EasyTech software or without utilizing EasyTech software. The 21st Century Skills assessment by Learning.com was be utilized as the summative digital literacy assessment. The results of this study showed that there were main effects of Race, SES, and EasyTech, and the interaction between Race and SES was shown to be a significant factor. Finally, the results also showed overall students who used the EasyTech program scored higher than students who did not use the EasyTech program. As a result, the null hypothesis was rejected.

ISBN: 9781369050622Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.

Blended Technology Rich Instruction Verses Blended Computer Managed Instruction in 8th Grade Digital Literacy Instruction.
LDR:03358nmm a2200301 4500 001 2123778
005 20171010112649.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369050622
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10149966
035 $a AAI10149966
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Puccetti, Gregory Peter. $3 3285720
245 1 0 $a Blended Technology Rich Instruction Verses Blended Computer Managed Instruction in 8th Grade Digital Literacy Instruction.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 112 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Leah Wickersham-Fish.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2017.
520 $a Blended learning research is becoming increasingly popular at the K-12 level; however, past research has focused primarily on post-secondary learning environments. Additionally, while much research has focused on comparisons between online and blended learning to traditional learning, few studies have focused on comparisons between different models of blended learning. Little research has been found that compares learning outcomes between two different blended learning styles in the area of middle school digital literacy. Therefore, it is not known if students taking an 8th grade computer class score significantly better on a standardized digital literacy test when utilizing a computer mediated instruction (CMI) software program like EasyTech in a blended learning environment than those who did not utilize the EasyTech software in a similar blended learning environment. Additionally, it is not known if the independent variables of race, gender, or socioeconomic status (SES) have any effect on the outcome. The purpose of this ex post facto causal comparative study was to compare digital literacy achievement test scores of 8th grade students in a computer class being taught in a blended CMI learning environment utilizing EasyTech software to 8th grade students in a computer class who were taught in a blended learning environment without utilizing EasyTech software. This study utilized data from 3622 8th grade students from a large diverse urban school district that have taken a digital literacy class and a digital literacy assessment. The student data and test scores were drawn from the school district's student information service (SIS). The independent variables were race, gender, SES, and post-test scores. The dependent variable was the type of blended learning environment, classes taught utilizing EasyTech software or without utilizing EasyTech software. The 21st Century Skills assessment by Learning.com was be utilized as the summative digital literacy assessment. The results of this study showed that there were main effects of Race, SES, and EasyTech, and the interaction between Race and SES was shown to be a significant factor. Finally, the results also showed overall students who used the EasyTech program scored higher than students who did not use the EasyTech program. As a result, the null hypothesis was rejected.
590 $a School code: 1443.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 969762
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b School of Education. $3 2104297
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-03A(E).
790 $a 1443
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10149966