東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Indigenous rights and constitutional...

Scofield, Katherine Bowen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Indigenous rights and constitutional change in Ecuador.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Indigenous rights and constitutional change in Ecuador./
作者:	Scofield, Katherine Bowen.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	311 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10260893
ISBN:	9781369669039

Indigenous rights and constitutional change in Ecuador.
Scofield, Katherine Bowen.

Indigenous rights and constitutional change in Ecuador. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 311 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2017.

My dissertation, Indigenous Rights and Constitutional Change in Ecuador, is motivated by a question that has inspired a rich discussion in the political theory literature: how should democracies accommodate indigenous groups? I focus on this question in the context of indigenous participation in the 2008 Ecuadorian constitutional convention. Ecuador is an interesting case in that the constitutional convention represented an opportunity for indigenous and non-indigenous groups to discuss the very topics that concern political theorists: the ideal relationship between indigenous and non-indigenous communities, the formal recognition of indigenous groups, indigenous rights, the fair economic distribution of resources, and the nature of citizenship. However, despite the fact that indigenous groups focused on constitutional change as a vehicle for indigenous empowerment, the political theory literature is largely silent on how constitutional change can affect minority groups. This silence is indicative of a larger failure on the part of political theorists to fully consider how institutions shape the normative goals of a society. Similarly, the literature on constitutional design does not examine indigenous groups as a separate case study and, therefore, provides little guidance as to how institutions can be used to empower indigenous groups.

ISBN: 9781369669039Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Indigenous rights and constitutional change in Ecuador.
LDR:03500nmm a2200301 4500 001 2123510
005 20171003070858.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369669039
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10260893
035 $a AAI10260893
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Scofield, Katherine Bowen. $3 3285429
245 1 0 $a Indigenous rights and constitutional change in Ecuador.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 311 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Lauren M. MacLean; William E. Scheuerman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2017.
520 $a My dissertation, Indigenous Rights and Constitutional Change in Ecuador, is motivated by a question that has inspired a rich discussion in the political theory literature: how should democracies accommodate indigenous groups? I focus on this question in the context of indigenous participation in the 2008 Ecuadorian constitutional convention. Ecuador is an interesting case in that the constitutional convention represented an opportunity for indigenous and non-indigenous groups to discuss the very topics that concern political theorists: the ideal relationship between indigenous and non-indigenous communities, the formal recognition of indigenous groups, indigenous rights, the fair economic distribution of resources, and the nature of citizenship. However, despite the fact that indigenous groups focused on constitutional change as a vehicle for indigenous empowerment, the political theory literature is largely silent on how constitutional change can affect minority groups. This silence is indicative of a larger failure on the part of political theorists to fully consider how institutions shape the normative goals of a society. Similarly, the literature on constitutional design does not examine indigenous groups as a separate case study and, therefore, provides little guidance as to how institutions can be used to empower indigenous groups.
520 $a During the constitutional convention, indigenous people in Ecuador presented their own plan for constitutional change: plurinationalism. This paradigm combined the idea of indigenous group rights with a call for alternative means of economic development, radical environmentalism, and recognition of an intercultural Ecuadorian identity. In so doing, plurinationalism moved beyond the general parameters of group rights and/or power-sharing arrangements discussed by political theorists and constitutional design scholars. In this dissertation, therefore, I examine the underlying tenets of plurinationalism, how plurinationalism was interpreted by non-indigenous people and incorporated into the 2008 constitution, and the future constitutional implications of plurinationalism. I argue that the Ecuadorian case has implications for both the political theory and constitutional design literatures: it allows political theorists to move beyond the language of indigenous rights to consider other institutional avenues for indigenous empowerment and points to value for design scholars in considering indigenous people as a separate case study, reframing assumptions about constitution-making in divided societies.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Latin American studies. $3 2122903
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0550
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $b Political Science. $3 1027983
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08A(E).
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10260893