東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultura...

Allen, Margaret L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultural Coalition to Stop a Fossil Fuel Export Terminal in the Salish Sea.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultural Coalition to Stop a Fossil Fuel Export Terminal in the Salish Sea./
作者:	Allen, Margaret L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	82 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-05(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10138617
ISBN:	9781339941745

Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultural Coalition to Stop a Fossil Fuel Export Terminal in the Salish Sea.
Allen, Margaret L.

Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultural Coalition to Stop a Fossil Fuel Export Terminal in the Salish Sea. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 82 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016.

Indigenous and non-indigenous coalitions have the potential to both empower communities and affect the policy agenda. These relationships, however, are often complicated by differing worldviews and varying levels of power in legal, social, and political matters. As a case study, this thesis analyzes the coalition and advocacy alliances formed to stop the Gateway Pacific Terminal, a proposed coal export facility at Cherry Point, Washington, near the indigenous Lummi Nation. Interviews provide insight into the various environmental and faith-based actors that formed a relationship with the Lummi Nation. The results of these interviews show the Lummi Nation's desire for community capacity building against potential exploitation and colonialism. Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to this case study demonstrates: 1) how this alliance has formed, 2) how it is affecting policy, and 3) what power imbalances may exist. Further analysis of this qualitative data provides guidance to indigenous groups and potential advocates on gathering their resources and uniting their core beliefs to successfully form future coalitions. On May 9, 2016, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers denied the construction commencement permit of the Gateway Pacific Terminal project. This was the result of the Lummi Nation's legal right to access their fishing grounds; however, the advocacy of the coalition brought additional pressure and influenced the permit process. This successful coalition highlights the ability of advocacy groups and indigenous communities to strengthen relationships and impact the policy process.

ISBN: 9781339941745Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultural Coalition to Stop a Fossil Fuel Export Terminal in the Salish Sea.
LDR:02564nmm a2200301 4500 001 2123483
005 20171003070854.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339941745
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10138617
035 $a AAI10138617
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Allen, Margaret L. $3 3285403
245 1 0 $a Stronger Together: The Cross-Cultural Coalition to Stop a Fossil Fuel Export Terminal in the Salish Sea.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 82 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
500 $a Advisers: Nives Dolsak; Sara Breslow.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016.
520 $a Indigenous and non-indigenous coalitions have the potential to both empower communities and affect the policy agenda. These relationships, however, are often complicated by differing worldviews and varying levels of power in legal, social, and political matters. As a case study, this thesis analyzes the coalition and advocacy alliances formed to stop the Gateway Pacific Terminal, a proposed coal export facility at Cherry Point, Washington, near the indigenous Lummi Nation. Interviews provide insight into the various environmental and faith-based actors that formed a relationship with the Lummi Nation. The results of these interviews show the Lummi Nation's desire for community capacity building against potential exploitation and colonialism. Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to this case study demonstrates: 1) how this alliance has formed, 2) how it is affecting policy, and 3) what power imbalances may exist. Further analysis of this qualitative data provides guidance to indigenous groups and potential advocates on gathering their resources and uniting their core beliefs to successfully form future coalitions. On May 9, 2016, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers denied the construction commencement permit of the Gateway Pacific Terminal project. This was the result of the Lummi Nation's legal right to access their fishing grounds; however, the advocacy of the coalition brought additional pressure and influenced the permit process. This successful coalition highlights the ability of advocacy groups and indigenous communities to strengthen relationships and impact the policy process.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Environmental justice. $3 528369
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0619
690 $a 0528
710 2 0 $a University of Washington. $b Marine & Environmental Affairs. $3 2101352
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-05(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Master's
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10138617