東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Inclusivity and peacemaking in inter...

Ghais, Suzanne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Inclusivity and peacemaking in internal armed conflicts.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Inclusivity and peacemaking in internal armed conflicts./
作者:	Ghais, Suzanne.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	347 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10103345
ISBN:	9781339669250

Inclusivity and peacemaking in internal armed conflicts.
Ghais, Suzanne.

Inclusivity and peacemaking in internal armed conflicts. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 347 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--American University, 2016.

There is a tension between arguments for the importance of inclusive peace processes and arguments for limiting the number of parties to negotiation. This paper examines two aspects of inclusivity---inclusion of civil society and of armed parties---and their relationship to the achievement of durable settlement of intrastate armed conflicts. Four cases are examined using process-tracing and structured, focused comparison. The inclusive case of Liberia shows that negotiations that involve both civil society and all major armed groups support durable settlement when civil society is strong and unified for peace. The exclusive case of Chad shows how excluding armed groups from peace negotiations creates spoilers. The mixed case of the Philippines-MNLF negotiation shows that where civil society is relatively weak and divided, in-depth civil society consultation had important results but did not overcome the impacts of excluding a major armed group. The mixed case of the subsequent Philippines-MILF negotiation shows how an armed group moderated its stance through the negotiation process and how an extreme group was excluded without detriment to peace. Across cases, the causal processes involved agreement content and public support. Civic groups tend to address public interests and sources of conflict, whereas armed groups tend to negotiate for self-interested gains. Public support or disapproval follows, and civil society may also work directly to build public support. The study offers a better understanding of how and under what circumstances civil society most contributes to peace and the importance of including all major armed parties.

ISBN: 9781339669250Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.

Inclusivity and peacemaking in internal armed conflicts.
LDR:02558nmm a2200289 4500 001 2122813
005 20170926091802.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339669250
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10103345
035 $a AAI10103345
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ghais, Suzanne. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-4531-6119 $3 3284780
245 1 0 $a Inclusivity and peacemaking in internal armed conflicts.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 347 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Anthony C. Wanis-St. John.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--American University, 2016.
520 $a There is a tension between arguments for the importance of inclusive peace processes and arguments for limiting the number of parties to negotiation. This paper examines two aspects of inclusivity---inclusion of civil society and of armed parties---and their relationship to the achievement of durable settlement of intrastate armed conflicts. Four cases are examined using process-tracing and structured, focused comparison. The inclusive case of Liberia shows that negotiations that involve both civil society and all major armed groups support durable settlement when civil society is strong and unified for peace. The exclusive case of Chad shows how excluding armed groups from peace negotiations creates spoilers. The mixed case of the Philippines-MNLF negotiation shows that where civil society is relatively weak and divided, in-depth civil society consultation had important results but did not overcome the impacts of excluding a major armed group. The mixed case of the subsequent Philippines-MILF negotiation shows how an armed group moderated its stance through the negotiation process and how an extreme group was excluded without detriment to peace. Across cases, the causal processes involved agreement content and public support. Civic groups tend to address public interests and sources of conflict, whereas armed groups tend to negotiate for self-interested gains. Public support or disapproval follows, and civil society may also work directly to build public support. The study offers a better understanding of how and under what circumstances civil society most contributes to peace and the importance of including all major armed parties.
590 $a School code: 0008.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Peace studies. $3 3172392
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0563
710 2 $a American University. $b School of International Service. $3 2096864
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
790 $a 0008
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10103345