東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring self-reported survey data ...

Hottell, Derek.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring self-reported survey data in higher education as an artifact of socio-environmentally influenced behavior.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring self-reported survey data in higher education as an artifact of socio-environmentally influenced behavior./
作者:	Hottell, Derek.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	263 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-12A(E).
標題:	Higher education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10144611
ISBN:	9781339997315

Exploring self-reported survey data in higher education as an artifact of socio-environmentally influenced behavior.
Hottell, Derek.

Exploring self-reported survey data in higher education as an artifact of socio-environmentally influenced behavior. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 263 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2016.

Much of the research about college student engagement is based upon self-reported surveys, but little is known about how students formulate responses to these instruments. The purpose of this study was to specifically address this dearth of knowledge by deepening our understanding of how students' perceptions of their environments and demographic characteristics influenced their response patterns on self-reported surveys. Bronfenbrenner's (2005) human ecology model of development, Bourdieu and Passeron's (1990) theory of social reproduction, and Tourangeau, Rips, and Rasinski's (2000) four phase survey response process were used, as the theoretical framework to better understand this phenomenon. This was an explanatory sequential mixed methods study, and the participants were first-year undergraduate students at a four-year, private institution in New England. Students completed the College Student Report (CSR) as well as a series of time-use diaries, and the results of the instruments were compared using descriptive and multivariate analyses. Finally, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted, which included aspects of retrospective cognitive interviewing, with twenty-seven (27) students to understand how their experiences and response processes were shaped by their individual campus experiences and identities. Findings from this study suggest the construct validity of self-reported survey data measuring behavioral frequency patterns is questionable, as students statistically significantly under reported time spent preparing for class, engaging in co-curricular activities, commuting to campus, and relaxing and socializing. Furthermore, student characteristics such as racial/ethnic identity and satisfaction with college choice statistically significantly explained some of the variance in the reporting behaviors of students after controlling for other factors. This information coupled with the data gleaned from the semi-structured individual interviews indicate factors related to how students differentially experience the campus environment based upon their unique ecological niches affects how they respond on self-reported surveys, which means the data provided by such instrumentation is likely providing substantively different information than how it is most commonly interpreted and applied.

ISBN: 9781339997315Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.

Exploring self-reported survey data in higher education as an artifact of socio-environmentally influenced behavior.
LDR:03355nmm a2200325 4500 001 2122427
005 20170922124914.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339997315
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10144611
035 $a AAI10144611
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hottell, Derek. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-9835-1647 $3 3284400
245 1 0 $a Exploring self-reported survey data in higher education as an artifact of socio-environmentally influenced behavior.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 263 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Heather Rowan-Kenyon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2016.
520 $a Much of the research about college student engagement is based upon self-reported surveys, but little is known about how students formulate responses to these instruments. The purpose of this study was to specifically address this dearth of knowledge by deepening our understanding of how students' perceptions of their environments and demographic characteristics influenced their response patterns on self-reported surveys. Bronfenbrenner's (2005) human ecology model of development, Bourdieu and Passeron's (1990) theory of social reproduction, and Tourangeau, Rips, and Rasinski's (2000) four phase survey response process were used, as the theoretical framework to better understand this phenomenon. This was an explanatory sequential mixed methods study, and the participants were first-year undergraduate students at a four-year, private institution in New England. Students completed the College Student Report (CSR) as well as a series of time-use diaries, and the results of the instruments were compared using descriptive and multivariate analyses. Finally, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted, which included aspects of retrospective cognitive interviewing, with twenty-seven (27) students to understand how their experiences and response processes were shaped by their individual campus experiences and identities. Findings from this study suggest the construct validity of self-reported survey data measuring behavioral frequency patterns is questionable, as students statistically significantly under reported time spent preparing for class, engaging in co-curricular activities, commuting to campus, and relaxing and socializing. Furthermore, student characteristics such as racial/ethnic identity and satisfaction with college choice statistically significantly explained some of the variance in the reporting behaviors of students after controlling for other factors. This information coupled with the data gleaned from the semi-structured individual interviews indicate factors related to how students differentially experience the campus environment based upon their unique ecological niches affects how they respond on self-reported surveys, which means the data provided by such instrumentation is likely providing substantively different information than how it is most commonly interpreted and applied.
590 $a School code: 0016.
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 516948
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Demography. $3 614991
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0938
710 2 $a Boston College. $b Educational Leadership and Higher Education. $3 3191929
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-12A(E).
790 $a 0016
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10144611