東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The path towards clear and convincin...

Greene, Frederick V.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The path towards clear and convincing digital privacy rights.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The path towards clear and convincing digital privacy rights./
作者:	Greene, Frederick V.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	133 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-03A(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10172338
ISBN:	9781369271072

The path towards clear and convincing digital privacy rights.
Greene, Frederick V.

The path towards clear and convincing digital privacy rights. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 133 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2016.

This study was a legal based inquiry to determine to what extend digital privacy rights are adequately protected by existing law. Because the major statutory vehicle that guides privacy rights in America was passed in 1986, the courts have had to address issues not contemplated by the statute. This study reviews the rulings of all twelve United States Courts of Appeal to determine whether or not digital privacy rights are expanded or limited. Comparisons are made between various circuits and different regions of the country. Three questions are addressed in this study, summarized as; a question about the current status of digital privacy laws; a question about the impact of court decisions on digital privacy rights; and a question and assessment about the adequacy of digital privacy laws. Also, recommendations are suggested for how digital privacy rights can be enhanced in the future. These recommendations would first change the standard needed to issue warrants and to access an individuals' digital privacy rights to a "clear and convincing" analysis and standard. Secondly, the author recommends that digital privacy rights should become analogous to intellectual property rights and should have the same level of protection afforded intellectual property rights. Although digital privacy is not yet firmly recognized as more akin to Intellectual Property deserving of heightened protection, this study recommends that digital privacy, along with trade secret, copyright and patents, and trademark law should all be considered a type of intellectual capital that needs to be protected from those not authorized to access or utilize that intellectual property.

ISBN: 9781369271072Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The path towards clear and convincing digital privacy rights.
LDR:02644nmm a2200313 4500 001 2122111
005 20170912094006.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369271072
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10172338
035 $a AAI10172338
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Greene, Frederick V. $3 3284063
245 1 4 $a The path towards clear and convincing digital privacy rights.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 133 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Linda L. Naimi.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2016.
520 $a This study was a legal based inquiry to determine to what extend digital privacy rights are adequately protected by existing law. Because the major statutory vehicle that guides privacy rights in America was passed in 1986, the courts have had to address issues not contemplated by the statute. This study reviews the rulings of all twelve United States Courts of Appeal to determine whether or not digital privacy rights are expanded or limited. Comparisons are made between various circuits and different regions of the country. Three questions are addressed in this study, summarized as; a question about the current status of digital privacy laws; a question about the impact of court decisions on digital privacy rights; and a question and assessment about the adequacy of digital privacy laws. Also, recommendations are suggested for how digital privacy rights can be enhanced in the future. These recommendations would first change the standard needed to issue warrants and to access an individuals' digital privacy rights to a "clear and convincing" analysis and standard. Secondly, the author recommends that digital privacy rights should become analogous to intellectual property rights and should have the same level of protection afforded intellectual property rights. Although digital privacy is not yet firmly recognized as more akin to Intellectual Property deserving of heightened protection, this study recommends that digital privacy, along with trade secret, copyright and patents, and trademark law should all be considered a type of intellectual capital that needs to be protected from those not authorized to access or utilize that intellectual property.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Technology Leadership and Innovation. $3 2104450
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-03A(E).
790 $a 0183
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10172338