東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court...

Saleh, Matt.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court Communication of Metaphor in Education Finance Litigation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court Communication of Metaphor in Education Finance Litigation./
作者:	Saleh, Matt.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	214 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-10A(E).
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3705741
ISBN:	9781321790788

Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court Communication of Metaphor in Education Finance Litigation.
Saleh, Matt.

Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court Communication of Metaphor in Education Finance Litigation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 214 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2015.

This project uses a mixed methods approach to analyze the communication of metaphors about educational equity and adequacy, between co-equal state supreme courts in education finance litigation (1971-present). Evidence demonstrates that a number of pervasive metaphors about students and educational opportunities ("sound basic education," "marketplace of ideas," students as "competitors in the global economy") have been shared and conventionalized within judicial networks, with significant implications for how courts interpret educational rights under state constitutions. The project first conducts a qualitative discourse analysis of education finance litigation in New York State (four cases) using Pragglejaz Group's (2007) Metaphor Identification Procedure, to identify micro-level examples of metaphor usage in actual judicial discourse. Then, it performs quantitative and qualitative social network analysis of the entire education finance judicial network for state supreme courts (65 cases), to analyze two different "relations" between this set of actors: shared citation (formal relation) and shared metaphor (informal relation). Data analysis shows that there exist both formal and informal channels of judicial communication---communication we can "see," and communication we can't---and commonalities in discursive strategies (informal ties) are, in some ways, potentially more cohesive than direct, formal ties. The project also finds that courts looking to break with existing state precedent are more likely to turn to inter-court metaphors to validate their holdings. This project seeks to describe how metaphors become diffuse within judicial networks, and more generally seeks to enhance understanding of the ways in which political viewpoints on public benefits and rights are communicated through elite channels.

ISBN: 9781321790788Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.

Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court Communication of Metaphor in Education Finance Litigation.
LDR:02760nmm a2200289 4500 001 2121798
005 20170811100942.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321790788
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3705741
035 $a AAI3705741
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Saleh, Matt. $3 3283735
245 1 0 $a Great Minds Speak Alike: Inter-Court Communication of Metaphor in Education Finance Litigation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 214 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jeffrey Henig.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2015.
520 $a This project uses a mixed methods approach to analyze the communication of metaphors about educational equity and adequacy, between co-equal state supreme courts in education finance litigation (1971-present). Evidence demonstrates that a number of pervasive metaphors about students and educational opportunities ("sound basic education," "marketplace of ideas," students as "competitors in the global economy") have been shared and conventionalized within judicial networks, with significant implications for how courts interpret educational rights under state constitutions. The project first conducts a qualitative discourse analysis of education finance litigation in New York State (four cases) using Pragglejaz Group's (2007) Metaphor Identification Procedure, to identify micro-level examples of metaphor usage in actual judicial discourse. Then, it performs quantitative and qualitative social network analysis of the entire education finance judicial network for state supreme courts (65 cases), to analyze two different "relations" between this set of actors: shared citation (formal relation) and shared metaphor (informal relation). Data analysis shows that there exist both formal and informal channels of judicial communication---communication we can "see," and communication we can't---and commonalities in discursive strategies (informal ties) are, in some ways, potentially more cohesive than direct, formal ties. The project also finds that courts looking to break with existing state precedent are more likely to turn to inter-court metaphors to validate their holdings. This project seeks to describe how metaphors become diffuse within judicial networks, and more generally seeks to enhance understanding of the ways in which political viewpoints on public benefits and rights are communicated through elite channels.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b TC: Politics and Education. $3 1684380
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-10A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3705741