東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Differences in the economic developm...

Tung, Linda Pooh.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Differences in the economic development of South Korea and Taiwan, 1960-1988.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Differences in the economic development of South Korea and Taiwan, 1960-1988./
作者:	Tung, Linda Pooh.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1994,
面頁冊數:	122 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-07, Section: A, page: 2093.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International55-07A.
標題:	Economic theory. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9431325

Differences in the economic development of South Korea and Taiwan, 1960-1988.
Tung, Linda Pooh.

Differences in the economic development of South Korea and Taiwan, 1960-1988. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1994 - 122 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-07, Section: A, page: 2093.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 1994.

Despite the worldwide economic slowdown, South Korea and Taiwan achieved remarkable growth during the 1980s. They both began industrialization under similar conditions, pursued similar development strategies, and used government intervention to help achieve goals.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1556984
Economic theory.

Differences in the economic development of South Korea and Taiwan, 1960-1988.
LDR:03142nmm a2200313 4500 001 2121342
005 20170808141844.5
008 180830s1994 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9431325
035 $a AAI9431325
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tung, Linda Pooh. $3 3283315
245 1 0 $a Differences in the economic development of South Korea and Taiwan, 1960-1988.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1994
300 $a 122 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-07, Section: A, page: 2093.
500 $a Chairman: W. Paul Strassmann.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 1994.
520 $a Despite the worldwide economic slowdown, South Korea and Taiwan achieved remarkable growth during the 1980s. They both began industrialization under similar conditions, pursued similar development strategies, and used government intervention to help achieve goals.
520 $a In spite of these similarities, in managing their respective economic affairs, one important difference existed in the growth pattern between these two countries. In Taiwan, the phase of economic management was fairly uniform throughout 1960-1988, while in South Korea there were two distinctive phases. The government of South Korea played a large role in the economy during the 1960s and 1970s, but since then it has shifted to relying more on market forces.
520 $a The implication of this managing policy change on South Korea's economy and comparison of the differences in the growth path of the GNP between the two, are investigated by analyzing the Coefficient of Variation figures as derived from sequences of GNP, and the fluctuations in the growth pattern of both countries. Policy intervention can help government reach certain development goals. However, as market conditions change, policy intervention can become counterproductive or obsolete in economic restructuring and adjustment; it can be accompanied by undesirable distortions and imbalances which affect growth and economic stability.
520 $a Macroeconomic performance has improved in South Korea since market forces have been given more relevance. In the early period of industrialization, Taiwan used state controls to a smaller degree. However, Taiwan's performance has deteriorated during the 1980s relative to its past because the government failed to liberalize as much as it should have. This may be one reason for Taiwan's slower growth compared to South Korea's since the early 1980s. Political and other factors unique to each country help explain these differences.
520 $a As a manifestation of the extent of the government's involvement in economic policy, the machine tools industry is investigated as a special case study to compare the role played by each of the two countries. This study is also concerned with policy instruments used in developing various strategic industries.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Economic theory. $3 1556984
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $3 676168
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 55-07A.
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1994
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9431325