東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Consumer preference for packaging ma...

Klaiman, Kimberly.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Consumer preference for packaging materials: Willingness to pay and barriers to recycling.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Consumer preference for packaging materials: Willingness to pay and barriers to recycling./
作者:	Klaiman, Kimberly.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	83 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-03(E).
標題:	Agricultural economics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1605367
ISBN:	9781339319711

Consumer preference for packaging materials: Willingness to pay and barriers to recycling.
Klaiman, Kimberly.

Consumer preference for packaging materials: Willingness to pay and barriers to recycling. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 83 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Michigan State University, 2015.

This study focuses on the application of a stated preference elicitation method to assess consumer preferences for packaging recyclability. In collaboration with top executives from food companies, a survey was developed in order to obtain current recycling habits from an online sample of 2,000 respondents, who self identified as the primary household decision-maker and grocery shopper. Two choice experiments were used to determine consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for packaging recyclability and barriers to recycling. This study contributes to the literature on individual packaging and its components that increase or hinder recycling. The effectiveness of indirect questioning and information treatments on influencing consumer behavior was also analyzed using a between subject design. Our results show an average positive willingness to pay for packaging recyclability, with a fraction of respondents having an estimated negative willingness to pay. Willingness to accept to clean in order to recycle has significant and positive for all treatment groups. The analysis of the information treatments showed that consumers were responsive to the video treatment by increasing their WTP for packaging recyclability, but not responsive to the infographic treatment. Evidence of social desirability bias was found in this analysis, suggesting more scrutiny should be placed on estimates that do not address social desirability bias.

ISBN: 9781339319711Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172150
Agricultural economics.

Consumer preference for packaging materials: Willingness to pay and barriers to recycling.
LDR:02346nmm a2200289 4500 001 2121057
005 20170724102942.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339319711
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1605367
035 $a AAI1605367
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Klaiman, Kimberly. $3 3283048
245 1 0 $a Consumer preference for packaging materials: Willingness to pay and barriers to recycling.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 83 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03.
500 $a Advisers: Cloe Garnache; David Ortega.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Michigan State University, 2015.
520 $a This study focuses on the application of a stated preference elicitation method to assess consumer preferences for packaging recyclability. In collaboration with top executives from food companies, a survey was developed in order to obtain current recycling habits from an online sample of 2,000 respondents, who self identified as the primary household decision-maker and grocery shopper. Two choice experiments were used to determine consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for packaging recyclability and barriers to recycling. This study contributes to the literature on individual packaging and its components that increase or hinder recycling. The effectiveness of indirect questioning and information treatments on influencing consumer behavior was also analyzed using a between subject design. Our results show an average positive willingness to pay for packaging recyclability, with a fraction of respondents having an estimated negative willingness to pay. Willingness to accept to clean in order to recycle has significant and positive for all treatment groups. The analysis of the information treatments showed that consumers were responsive to the video treatment by increasing their WTP for packaging recyclability, but not responsive to the infographic treatment. Evidence of social desirability bias was found in this analysis, suggesting more scrutiny should be placed on estimates that do not address social desirability bias.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Agricultural economics. $3 3172150
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0640
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics. $3 2096149
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-03(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1605367