語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake...
~
Dempsey, Randy James.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Ammonia Volatilization from Urea as Affected by Urea Amendment and Simulated Rainfall.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Ammonia Volatilization from Urea as Affected by Urea Amendment and Simulated Rainfall./
作者:
Dempsey, Randy James.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:
123 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International54-04(E).
標題:
Agronomy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1586483
ISBN:
9781321682038
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Ammonia Volatilization from Urea as Affected by Urea Amendment and Simulated Rainfall.
Dempsey, Randy James.
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Ammonia Volatilization from Urea as Affected by Urea Amendment and Simulated Rainfall.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 123 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Arkansas, 2015.
The effect of rainfall between urea application and flood establishment on N loss and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) has not been studied. The first research objective was to compare the effects of simulated rainfall amounts and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) urease inhibitor rate on NH3 volatilization and rice growth. Three field experiments were conducted and NH3 volatilization was measured in two experiments for 11 days after urea application (DAU) in semi-open chambers. Urea or NBPT-treated urea (NBPT-Urea) was subjected to six simulated rainfall amounts (0-25 mm) applied 5 to 15 h after urea application and flooded 7 to 12 DAU. Cumulative NH3 loss from Urea accounted for 8.6% of the applied N with no simulated rainfall and decreased quadratically to 0.6% with 24 mm of simulated rainfall. Cumulative NH 3 loss from NBPT-Urea also decreased quadratically as simulated rainfall amount increased but loss was 0.2-2.0% of the applied-N. Depending on the site, yields of rice fertilized with Urea decreased linearly or nonlinearly as simulated rainfall increased with the greatest yield produced by rice receiving no simulated rainfall. The yields of rice fertilized with NBPT-Urea were not affected by simulated rainfall amount in two trials. In the third trial, the yields of rice fertilized with NBPT-Urea decreased nonlinearly as simulated rainfall amount increased but were 8.9 to 18.1% greater than the yields of Urea-fertilized rice. Rainfall following preflood urea application appears to reduce NH3 loss but increase N loss via denitrification. Total-N loss was reduced when urea was treated with NBPT. Our second research objective was to compare the effects of simulated rainfall time and selected urea-N amendments on rice N uptake and grain yield. Two field experiments were conducted to evaluate rice growth as affected by two NBPT rates (0 and 0.89 g NBPT kg -1 urea), two nitrapyrin (NP) rates (0 and 572 g NP ha-1), and three simulated rainfall timings [no simulated rainfall (NOSR), simulated rainfall before N (SRBN), and simulated rainfall after N (SRAN)]. Yield was unaffected by simulated rainfall timing when rice was fertilized with NBPT-treated urea (7904-8264 kg ha-1). When rice was fertilized with untreated urea (no NBPT), grain yields were greater with NOSR than with SRAN or SRBN. Within each simulated rainfall timing, rice yields were 6.9 to 21.3% greater when NBPT-treated urea was applied. Nitrapyrin rate had no effect on grain yield in 2013, but, compared to untreated urea (no NP), NP-treated urea decreased yield by 5.6% in 2014. Application of untreated urea to moist soil or dry soil followed by rainfall are field environments that result in more substantial N loss than urea applied to a dry soil that remains dry until the rice field is flooded. Use of NBPT-treated urea minimized N loss and maximized grain yield in each simulated rainfall scenario examined.
ISBN: 9781321682038Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122783
Agronomy.
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Ammonia Volatilization from Urea as Affected by Urea Amendment and Simulated Rainfall.
LDR
:03863nmm a2200289 4500
001
2121016
005
20170724102937.5
008
180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321682038
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI1586483
035
$a
AAI1586483
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Dempsey, Randy James.
$3
3283003
245
1 0
$a
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Ammonia Volatilization from Urea as Affected by Urea Amendment and Simulated Rainfall.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2015
300
$a
123 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
500
$a
Adviser: Nathan A. Slaton.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Arkansas, 2015.
520
$a
The effect of rainfall between urea application and flood establishment on N loss and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) has not been studied. The first research objective was to compare the effects of simulated rainfall amounts and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) urease inhibitor rate on NH3 volatilization and rice growth. Three field experiments were conducted and NH3 volatilization was measured in two experiments for 11 days after urea application (DAU) in semi-open chambers. Urea or NBPT-treated urea (NBPT-Urea) was subjected to six simulated rainfall amounts (0-25 mm) applied 5 to 15 h after urea application and flooded 7 to 12 DAU. Cumulative NH3 loss from Urea accounted for 8.6% of the applied N with no simulated rainfall and decreased quadratically to 0.6% with 24 mm of simulated rainfall. Cumulative NH 3 loss from NBPT-Urea also decreased quadratically as simulated rainfall amount increased but loss was 0.2-2.0% of the applied-N. Depending on the site, yields of rice fertilized with Urea decreased linearly or nonlinearly as simulated rainfall increased with the greatest yield produced by rice receiving no simulated rainfall. The yields of rice fertilized with NBPT-Urea were not affected by simulated rainfall amount in two trials. In the third trial, the yields of rice fertilized with NBPT-Urea decreased nonlinearly as simulated rainfall amount increased but were 8.9 to 18.1% greater than the yields of Urea-fertilized rice. Rainfall following preflood urea application appears to reduce NH3 loss but increase N loss via denitrification. Total-N loss was reduced when urea was treated with NBPT. Our second research objective was to compare the effects of simulated rainfall time and selected urea-N amendments on rice N uptake and grain yield. Two field experiments were conducted to evaluate rice growth as affected by two NBPT rates (0 and 0.89 g NBPT kg -1 urea), two nitrapyrin (NP) rates (0 and 572 g NP ha-1), and three simulated rainfall timings [no simulated rainfall (NOSR), simulated rainfall before N (SRBN), and simulated rainfall after N (SRAN)]. Yield was unaffected by simulated rainfall timing when rice was fertilized with NBPT-treated urea (7904-8264 kg ha-1). When rice was fertilized with untreated urea (no NBPT), grain yields were greater with NOSR than with SRAN or SRBN. Within each simulated rainfall timing, rice yields were 6.9 to 21.3% greater when NBPT-treated urea was applied. Nitrapyrin rate had no effect on grain yield in 2013, but, compared to untreated urea (no NP), NP-treated urea decreased yield by 5.6% in 2014. Application of untreated urea to moist soil or dry soil followed by rainfall are field environments that result in more substantial N loss than urea applied to a dry soil that remains dry until the rice field is flooded. Use of NBPT-treated urea minimized N loss and maximized grain yield in each simulated rainfall scenario examined.
590
$a
School code: 0011.
650
4
$a
Agronomy.
$3
2122783
650
4
$a
Soil sciences.
$3
2122699
690
$a
0285
690
$a
0481
710
2
$a
University of Arkansas.
$b
Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences.
$3
3169313
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
54-04(E).
790
$a
0011
791
$a
M.S.
792
$a
2015
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1586483
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9331633
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入