東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Have Institutional Barriers Impa...

Tanz, Alexander.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Have Institutional Barriers Impacted Implementation of Ecosystem Based Fishery Management in the US.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Have Institutional Barriers Impacted Implementation of Ecosystem Based Fishery Management in the US./
作者:	Tanz, Alexander.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	49 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-01(E).
標題:	Natural resource management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10162449
ISBN:	9781369172393

How Have Institutional Barriers Impacted Implementation of Ecosystem Based Fishery Management in the US.
Tanz, Alexander.

How Have Institutional Barriers Impacted Implementation of Ecosystem Based Fishery Management in the US. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 49 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-01.

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016.

Ecosystem based fisheries management (EBFM) has been studied for over twenty years, but has rarely been fully utilized in practice. EBFM utilizes multispecies management and ecosystem information, including physical oceanographic information and predator-prey relationships, to better manage fisheries. Regional fishery management councils started incorporating ecosystem information for management on an ad hoc basis in the mid-1990s, and suggestions to use ecosystem information appeared in legislation in 2007 (18 USC § 1882). Since that time, implementation has increased slowly at a national level, and is still virtually unused in some councils. One possible reason for the slow implementation is that institutional barriers have prevented EBFM from being embraced by managers. These barriers can be in the form of legislation and regulation, issues within the regional fishery management councils, judicial challenges, and budgetary or staffing shortages. The legislation has not been much of a barrier to EBFM, but regulations have been more troublesome for some regions. Institutional momentum may be one reason EBFM is not more common in US fisheries as regions face different levels of support for new management schemes due to factors like staffing, budget, and litigation.

ISBN: 9781369172393Subjects--Topical Terms:

589570
Natural resource management.

How Have Institutional Barriers Impacted Implementation of Ecosystem Based Fishery Management in the US.
LDR:02208nmm a2200289 4500 001 2120814
005 20170724102533.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369172393
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10162449
035 $a AAI10162449
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tanz, Alexander. $3 3282770
245 1 0 $a How Have Institutional Barriers Impacted Implementation of Ecosystem Based Fishery Management in the US.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 49 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-01.
500 $a Adviser: Edward Allison.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016.
520 $a Ecosystem based fisheries management (EBFM) has been studied for over twenty years, but has rarely been fully utilized in practice. EBFM utilizes multispecies management and ecosystem information, including physical oceanographic information and predator-prey relationships, to better manage fisheries. Regional fishery management councils started incorporating ecosystem information for management on an ad hoc basis in the mid-1990s, and suggestions to use ecosystem information appeared in legislation in 2007 (18 USC § 1882). Since that time, implementation has increased slowly at a national level, and is still virtually unused in some councils. One possible reason for the slow implementation is that institutional barriers have prevented EBFM from being embraced by managers. These barriers can be in the form of legislation and regulation, issues within the regional fishery management councils, judicial challenges, and budgetary or staffing shortages. The legislation has not been much of a barrier to EBFM, but regulations have been more troublesome for some regions. Institutional momentum may be one reason EBFM is not more common in US fisheries as regions face different levels of support for new management schemes due to factors like staffing, budget, and litigation.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Marine and Environmental Affairs. $3 2096871
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-01(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Master's
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10162449