東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effectiveness of Professional De...

Jackson, Mashika W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Changing Teachers' Behaviors in Utilizing Differentiated Instruction with Gifted Students in the General Elementary Classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Changing Teachers' Behaviors in Utilizing Differentiated Instruction with Gifted Students in the General Elementary Classroom./
作者:	Jackson, Mashika W.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	182 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-01A(E).
標題:	Elementary education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10140642
ISBN:	9781339960388

The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Changing Teachers' Behaviors in Utilizing Differentiated Instruction with Gifted Students in the General Elementary Classroom.
Jackson, Mashika W.

The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Changing Teachers' Behaviors in Utilizing Differentiated Instruction with Gifted Students in the General Elementary Classroom. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 182 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northcentral University, 2016.

The majority of teachers in the general classroom setting are not trained to offer gifted students the instruction that is necessary to have a challenging and enriching education. As a means to reach all students at their instructional level, especially gifted students, professional development is offered to learn how to differentiate instruction. The purpose of this quantitative pretest-posttest study was to analyze changes in teachers' behavior in utilizing differentiated instruction with gifted students in the general elementary classroom setting after receiving professional development on how to implement differentiated instruction. The study took place in 21 Title I elementary schools in the DeKalb County School District. The participants consisted of 50 teachers who interact with gifted students in grades first through fifth on a regular basis. There was a control and intervention group, with 25 teachers participating in each group. The control group partook in the pre- and post-surveys, whereas the intervention group took the surveys and received the professional development. Six separate MANOVA tests were performed on factors to determine whether there was a significant difference in how professional development affected teachers' utilization of differentiated instruction for gifted students between the administration of the pre- and post-surveys. The factors included: Factor 1 (Questioning and Thinking), Factor 2 (Providing Challenges and Choices), Factor 3 (Reading and Writing Assignments), Factor 4 (Curricular Modifications), Factor 5 (Enrichment Centers), and Factor 6 (Seatwork). The data revealed that there was no statistically significant difference for Factors 1 ( p = .245), Factor 2 (p = .290), Factor 4 ( p = .444), Factor 5 (p = .107) and Factor 6 ( p = .574). Factor 3 (p = .0534) may be rejected and support was found for the alternate hypothesis because significant effect was found in the average scores on the surveys between the intervention and control groups F(1,48) = 8.02, p = .007, partial eta2 = .143. Recommendations for the study include working with a larger sample size, that the professional development sessions be extended, allow teachers more time to implement the strategies, and utilize an expert, other than the researcher, to conduct the professional development sessions.

ISBN: 9781339960388Subjects--Topical Terms:

641385
Elementary education.

The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Changing Teachers' Behaviors in Utilizing Differentiated Instruction with Gifted Students in the General Elementary Classroom.
LDR:03372nmm a2200301 4500 001 2120079
005 20170705093020.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339960388
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10140642
035 $a AAI10140642
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jackson, Mashika W. $3 3281986
245 1 4 $a The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Changing Teachers' Behaviors in Utilizing Differentiated Instruction with Gifted Students in the General Elementary Classroom.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 182 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Deborah Circo.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northcentral University, 2016.
520 $a The majority of teachers in the general classroom setting are not trained to offer gifted students the instruction that is necessary to have a challenging and enriching education. As a means to reach all students at their instructional level, especially gifted students, professional development is offered to learn how to differentiate instruction. The purpose of this quantitative pretest-posttest study was to analyze changes in teachers' behavior in utilizing differentiated instruction with gifted students in the general elementary classroom setting after receiving professional development on how to implement differentiated instruction. The study took place in 21 Title I elementary schools in the DeKalb County School District. The participants consisted of 50 teachers who interact with gifted students in grades first through fifth on a regular basis. There was a control and intervention group, with 25 teachers participating in each group. The control group partook in the pre- and post-surveys, whereas the intervention group took the surveys and received the professional development. Six separate MANOVA tests were performed on factors to determine whether there was a significant difference in how professional development affected teachers' utilization of differentiated instruction for gifted students between the administration of the pre- and post-surveys. The factors included: Factor 1 (Questioning and Thinking), Factor 2 (Providing Challenges and Choices), Factor 3 (Reading and Writing Assignments), Factor 4 (Curricular Modifications), Factor 5 (Enrichment Centers), and Factor 6 (Seatwork). The data revealed that there was no statistically significant difference for Factors 1 ( p = .245), Factor 2 (p = .290), Factor 4 ( p = .444), Factor 5 (p = .107) and Factor 6 ( p = .574). Factor 3 (p = .0534) may be rejected and support was found for the alternate hypothesis because significant effect was found in the average scores on the surveys between the intervention and control groups F(1,48) = 8.02, p = .007, partial eta2 = .143. Recommendations for the study include working with a larger sample size, that the professional development sessions be extended, allow teachers more time to implement the strategies, and utilize an expert, other than the researcher, to conduct the professional development sessions.
590 $a School code: 1443.
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Gifted education. $3 3172499
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0445
690 $a 0530
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b School of Education. $3 2104297
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-01A(E).
790 $a 1443
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10140642