東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparison study of poverty studen...

Kehrer, Brian L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison study of poverty students' ISTEP+ growth model scores based on schools' socioeconomic status levels.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison study of poverty students' ISTEP+ growth model scores based on schools' socioeconomic status levels./
作者:	Kehrer, Brian L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	155 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-02A(E).
標題:	Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10144195
ISBN:	9781339993577

A comparison study of poverty students' ISTEP+ growth model scores based on schools' socioeconomic status levels.
Kehrer, Brian L.

A comparison study of poverty students' ISTEP+ growth model scores based on schools' socioeconomic status levels. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 155 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2016.

The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine if there is a significant difference in the English/language arts and mathematics 2014 ISTEP+ median growth model scores between students of poverty based on their school's socioeconomic status (SES) level. The study examined if student enrollment size, percentage of minority students, and special education student percentage serve as predictors of the school's ISTEP+ growth model score within different poverty levels. The study used Indiana public schools that contained students in Grades 4 through 8 who qualified for free and reduced lunches (FRL). The levels of SES were based on the school's FRL rate percentage and used three different levels: affluent (0-39.9%), moderate-poverty (40.0-60.0%), and high-poverty (60.1-100%). The results of this study showed only moderate-poverty middle schools were significantly different than high-poverty middle schools in the area of mathematics when looking between different levels of SES in elementary and middle schools. Special education student percentage was a significant predictor of ISTEP+ median growth model scores for ELA and mathematics in high-poverty elementary schools and ELA in affluent middle schools. In all three levels, special education percentage decreased the corresponding ISTEP+ growth model scores. Minority student percentage had a mixed effect on ISTEP+ median growth model scores. Mathematics scores increased in moderate-poverty elementary and affluent middle schools and decreased the ELA scores in high-poverty elementary schools and mathematics scores in moderate-poverty middle schools.

ISBN: 9781339993577Subjects--Topical Terms:

526425
Educational evaluation.

A comparison study of poverty students' ISTEP+ growth model scores based on schools' socioeconomic status levels.
LDR:02584nmm a2200289 4500 001 2119921
005 20170627090654.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339993577
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10144195
035 $a AAI10144195
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kehrer, Brian L. $3 3281822
245 1 2 $a A comparison study of poverty students' ISTEP+ growth model scores based on schools' socioeconomic status levels.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 155 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Terry McDaniel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2016.
520 $a The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine if there is a significant difference in the English/language arts and mathematics 2014 ISTEP+ median growth model scores between students of poverty based on their school's socioeconomic status (SES) level. The study examined if student enrollment size, percentage of minority students, and special education student percentage serve as predictors of the school's ISTEP+ growth model score within different poverty levels. The study used Indiana public schools that contained students in Grades 4 through 8 who qualified for free and reduced lunches (FRL). The levels of SES were based on the school's FRL rate percentage and used three different levels: affluent (0-39.9%), moderate-poverty (40.0-60.0%), and high-poverty (60.1-100%). The results of this study showed only moderate-poverty middle schools were significantly different than high-poverty middle schools in the area of mathematics when looking between different levels of SES in elementary and middle schools. Special education student percentage was a significant predictor of ISTEP+ median growth model scores for ELA and mathematics in high-poverty elementary schools and ELA in affluent middle schools. In all three levels, special education percentage decreased the corresponding ISTEP+ growth model scores. Minority student percentage had a mixed effect on ISTEP+ median growth model scores. Mathematics scores increased in moderate-poverty elementary and affluent middle schools and decreased the ELA scores in high-poverty elementary schools and mathematics scores in moderate-poverty middle schools.
590 $a School code: 0094.
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Indiana State University. $b Educational Leadership, Administration, and Foundations. $3 1679094
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-02A(E).
790 $a 0094
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10144195