語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Effect of RockTape Application t...
~
Hayden, Patrick.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Effect of RockTape Application to the Anterior Thigh When Kicking a Soccer Ball.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Effect of RockTape Application to the Anterior Thigh When Kicking a Soccer Ball./
作者:
Hayden, Patrick.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
43 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-09B(E).
標題:
Physical therapy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10277121
ISBN:
9781369743081
The Effect of RockTape Application to the Anterior Thigh When Kicking a Soccer Ball.
Hayden, Patrick.
The Effect of RockTape Application to the Anterior Thigh When Kicking a Soccer Ball.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 43 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
Thesis (D.P.T.)--Florida Gulf Coast University, 2017.
Introduction. The goal of this research was to determine whether RockTape can produce increases in athletic performance. More specifically, the authors tested whether RockTape application over the quadriceps muscles compared to placebo tape (Elastikon tape) and control would produce increases in velocity when kicking a soccer ball. Background. RockTape is an elastic tape that microscopically lifts the skin away from muscle and fascia to create a decompression effect. The main difference between Kinesiotape and RockTape is adhesive material and fiber count utilized. RockTape has been used in athletics and physical therapy for over a decade without proper research backing the claims and changes in performance when tape is applied. Methods. The study design utilized was a randomized controlled trial, with participants randomly placed into one of three conditions: RockTape, placebo tape, or control (no tape). The population for this study were men and women on the FGCU club soccer teams with a participant pool of 51 participants. Participants were excluded if they had been recently injured or were currently being treated for a lower quarter injury (low back to ankle), which might have impacted their ability to maximally strike a ball. This study included players 18 years and older that were cleared by the medical staff to participate. Every participant went through a standardized warm up prior to data collection to minimize injury risk during maximal kicks. Five baseline and experimental kicks were recorded and averaged for statistical analysis to determine the effect of RockTape vs placebo tape on kick velocity. Upon analysis of the data, it was determined there was no significant effect when applying either RockTape or placebo tape to the anterior thigh of collegiate club soccer players at FGCU. Results. The control group averaged 50.48 mph at baseline, RockTape averaged 51.48 mph at baseline and 50.87 mph when taped, and the placebo group averaged 50.41 mph baseline and 50.77 mph when taped. Discussion. RockTape had a net negative impact on kick velocity while placebo had a net positive impact on kick velocity in our participant pool, however, neither were statistically significant compared to control data. While there were no significant results found during this study, several limitations were observed that may have impacted the data and should be discussed. Some of these limitations include: lack of proper adhesion of the RockTape to players thighs, angle of the ball crossing the path of the radar gun, other muscles and technical skills affecting kick mechanics, and surface area coverage by the RockTape can all impact the resulting kick velocity. Conclusion. The use of RockTape over the quadriceps on the dominant leg did not facilitate an increase ball velocity when kicking a soccer ball. Future study is warranted to account for limitations encountered during this study to determine the true physiological implications for using RockTape.
ISBN: 9781369743081Subjects--Topical Terms:
588713
Physical therapy.
The Effect of RockTape Application to the Anterior Thigh When Kicking a Soccer Ball.
LDR
:03899nmm a2200277 4500
001
2119820
005
20170622092919.5
008
180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781369743081
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10277121
035
$a
AAI10277121
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Hayden, Patrick.
$3
2183228
245
1 4
$a
The Effect of RockTape Application to the Anterior Thigh When Kicking a Soccer Ball.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
43 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Adviser: Stephen Black.
502
$a
Thesis (D.P.T.)--Florida Gulf Coast University, 2017.
520
$a
Introduction. The goal of this research was to determine whether RockTape can produce increases in athletic performance. More specifically, the authors tested whether RockTape application over the quadriceps muscles compared to placebo tape (Elastikon tape) and control would produce increases in velocity when kicking a soccer ball. Background. RockTape is an elastic tape that microscopically lifts the skin away from muscle and fascia to create a decompression effect. The main difference between Kinesiotape and RockTape is adhesive material and fiber count utilized. RockTape has been used in athletics and physical therapy for over a decade without proper research backing the claims and changes in performance when tape is applied. Methods. The study design utilized was a randomized controlled trial, with participants randomly placed into one of three conditions: RockTape, placebo tape, or control (no tape). The population for this study were men and women on the FGCU club soccer teams with a participant pool of 51 participants. Participants were excluded if they had been recently injured or were currently being treated for a lower quarter injury (low back to ankle), which might have impacted their ability to maximally strike a ball. This study included players 18 years and older that were cleared by the medical staff to participate. Every participant went through a standardized warm up prior to data collection to minimize injury risk during maximal kicks. Five baseline and experimental kicks were recorded and averaged for statistical analysis to determine the effect of RockTape vs placebo tape on kick velocity. Upon analysis of the data, it was determined there was no significant effect when applying either RockTape or placebo tape to the anterior thigh of collegiate club soccer players at FGCU. Results. The control group averaged 50.48 mph at baseline, RockTape averaged 51.48 mph at baseline and 50.87 mph when taped, and the placebo group averaged 50.41 mph baseline and 50.77 mph when taped. Discussion. RockTape had a net negative impact on kick velocity while placebo had a net positive impact on kick velocity in our participant pool, however, neither were statistically significant compared to control data. While there were no significant results found during this study, several limitations were observed that may have impacted the data and should be discussed. Some of these limitations include: lack of proper adhesion of the RockTape to players thighs, angle of the ball crossing the path of the radar gun, other muscles and technical skills affecting kick mechanics, and surface area coverage by the RockTape can all impact the resulting kick velocity. Conclusion. The use of RockTape over the quadriceps on the dominant leg did not facilitate an increase ball velocity when kicking a soccer ball. Future study is warranted to account for limitations encountered during this study to determine the true physiological implications for using RockTape.
590
$a
School code: 1743.
650
4
$a
Physical therapy.
$3
588713
690
$a
0382
710
2
$a
Florida Gulf Coast University.
$b
Doctor of Physical Therapy.
$3
2104859
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-09B(E).
790
$a
1743
791
$a
D.P.T.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10277121
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9330438
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入