東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Between Law and Diplomacy: Internati...

Harris, Steven M.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Between Law and Diplomacy: International Dispute Resolution in the Long Nineteenth Century.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Between Law and Diplomacy: International Dispute Resolution in the Long Nineteenth Century./
Author:	Harris, Steven M.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	431 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-02A(E).
Subject:	Modern history. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3723630
ISBN:	9781339064635

Between Law and Diplomacy: International Dispute Resolution in the Long Nineteenth Century.
Harris, Steven M.

Between Law and Diplomacy: International Dispute Resolution in the Long Nineteenth Century. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 431 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2015.

From late in the eighteenth century through World War I, states increasingly resolved their differences through arbitration; entering into over 1000 agreements to address past controversies and provide for future disputes. Rather than relying entirely on traditional diplomatic methods, states responded to the practical needs of an increasingly complex, commercial, and bureaucratic world. They used mechanisms with some legalistic components; although these procedures remained under political control. Arbitration never prevented a war; the efforts of the Anglo-American peace movement, later augmented by continental activities and the rise of the international legal community, had but small and indirect effects. While appearing responsive to the new influence of public opinion, states only made agreements to arbitrate that were highly controlled and which typically encompassed only relationships and parties for whom war was already quite unlikely. Western powers also extensively used arbitral agreements to resolve and protect their imperial interests, both formal and informal.

ISBN: 9781339064635Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122829
Modern history.

Between Law and Diplomacy: International Dispute Resolution in the Long Nineteenth Century.
LDR:02786nmm a2200325 4500 001 2119500
005 20170619071238.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339064635
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3723630
035 $a AAI3723630
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Harris, Steven M. $3 3281378
245 1 0 $a Between Law and Diplomacy: International Dispute Resolution in the Long Nineteenth Century.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 431 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Edward Ross Dickinson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2015.
520 $a From late in the eighteenth century through World War I, states increasingly resolved their differences through arbitration; entering into over 1000 agreements to address past controversies and provide for future disputes. Rather than relying entirely on traditional diplomatic methods, states responded to the practical needs of an increasingly complex, commercial, and bureaucratic world. They used mechanisms with some legalistic components; although these procedures remained under political control. Arbitration never prevented a war; the efforts of the Anglo-American peace movement, later augmented by continental activities and the rise of the international legal community, had but small and indirect effects. While appearing responsive to the new influence of public opinion, states only made agreements to arbitrate that were highly controlled and which typically encompassed only relationships and parties for whom war was already quite unlikely. Western powers also extensively used arbitral agreements to resolve and protect their imperial interests, both formal and informal.
520 $a The traditional historiography of this field has been skewed by its emergence out of that peace movement, with its millennial, liberal, Eurocentric, and juridical biases. As a result, the significance of the Vienna settlements in launching the modern arbitral process has been overlooked, the Jay Treaty and the "Alabama Claims" case have been mythologized, the distinctive role of Latin American states has been sidelined, and the meaning of the Hague Conferences has been misunderstood.
520 $a States are political animals and their "states' system" was effective in using arbitration as a shared tool while preserving their essential political discretion and managing their domestic and international publics.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a Modern history. $3 2122829
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a University of California, Davis. $b History. $3 1670320
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-02A(E).
790 $a 0029
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3723630