東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Identifying with "the Native" in Ang...

Piper, Alexis F.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Identifying with "the Native" in Anglo-American environmental writing: A rhetorical study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Identifying with "the Native" in Anglo-American environmental writing: A rhetorical study./
作者:	Piper, Alexis F.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	277 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-05A(E).
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10245445
ISBN:	9781369473308

Identifying with "the Native" in Anglo-American environmental writing: A rhetorical study.
Piper, Alexis F.

Identifying with "the Native" in Anglo-American environmental writing: A rhetorical study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 277 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2016.

In an effort to contribute to rhetorical theories of "identification" this dissertation examines Anglo nature writing written for Anglo audiences in the United States over several centuries. In my conclusion, I suggest approaches current nature writers might use to offer audiences ways of engaging with Indigenous peoples and Native conceptions of environment that are more ethical, appropriate, and effective than approaches used in previous centuries. I maintain that such approaches could potentially open possibilities for less destructive conceptions of and relationships with the "natural" world than are currently in use. I rely on the rhetorical concept "identification" (as developed and complicated by theorists over the last century) in my analysis of Anglo-American environmental writing for whites in three different time periods, focusing on how influential and widely read nature writers encouraged their white readers to conceive of Native peoples and Native relationships with environment. First, I argue that Anglo-American writers of the mid-nineteenth century encouraged their audiences to feel nothing in common---to disidentify---with Natives and nature, an approach which reinforces the long-standing Western tradition of "othering" Natives and the natural world as adversaries to be conquered or as resources to be exploited. Then, in my analysis of Anglo-American nature writing of the second half of the twentieth century, I argue that writers of the time encouraged audiences to seek to become like---to consubstantially identify with---Native peoples and the natural world, an approach which ultimately suggests to audiences that Native peoples can be dissipated into sameness and are resources that can be known and owned. Finally, I argue that influential Anglo nature writers at the end of the twentieth century encourage their audiences to experience relationships with Native peoples that are marked by exploring both similarities and differences---a non-identification. However, although such non-identifications should open possibilities for white audiences and writers to listen to and learn from Indigenous eco-orientations, I also demonstrate how influential twenty-first century non-Native nature writers continue to write for white readers primarily about "the Native," without letting Indigenous peoples speak and be heard on their own terms and in their own words. Therefore, although non-identification is theorized as a first step towards genuine engagement and rhetorical listening, twenty-first century non-Native nature writing has not achieved this important objective of rhetorical listening in its construction of Native peoples. Through my analysis of each period, I illustrate how the kind of identification predominantly used in that period made sense given the political and cultural context of the time. However, in each era I analyze, authors also sow seeds for different kinds of identifications (for example, although Anglo writers of the mid-nineteenth century encouraged their white readers to construct disidentifications with Native peoples, there are seeds of consubstantial identifications). This dissertation thus ends with a consideration of how non-Native environmental writers can encourage their audiences to listen rhetorically to and construct more active non-identifications with Native writers and with Native writing on the environment in the hope that such an approach can encourage a wider range of possible relationships with and conceptions of our environment.

ISBN: 9781369473308Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Identifying with "the Native" in Anglo-American environmental writing: A rhetorical study.
LDR:04501nmm a2200301 4500 001 2118974
005 20170616102403.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369473308
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10245445
035 $a AAI10245445
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Piper, Alexis F. $3 3280821
245 1 0 $a Identifying with "the Native" in Anglo-American environmental writing: A rhetorical study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 277 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Anne F. Wysocki.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2016.
520 $a In an effort to contribute to rhetorical theories of "identification" this dissertation examines Anglo nature writing written for Anglo audiences in the United States over several centuries. In my conclusion, I suggest approaches current nature writers might use to offer audiences ways of engaging with Indigenous peoples and Native conceptions of environment that are more ethical, appropriate, and effective than approaches used in previous centuries. I maintain that such approaches could potentially open possibilities for less destructive conceptions of and relationships with the "natural" world than are currently in use. I rely on the rhetorical concept "identification" (as developed and complicated by theorists over the last century) in my analysis of Anglo-American environmental writing for whites in three different time periods, focusing on how influential and widely read nature writers encouraged their white readers to conceive of Native peoples and Native relationships with environment. First, I argue that Anglo-American writers of the mid-nineteenth century encouraged their audiences to feel nothing in common---to disidentify---with Natives and nature, an approach which reinforces the long-standing Western tradition of "othering" Natives and the natural world as adversaries to be conquered or as resources to be exploited. Then, in my analysis of Anglo-American nature writing of the second half of the twentieth century, I argue that writers of the time encouraged audiences to seek to become like---to consubstantially identify with---Native peoples and the natural world, an approach which ultimately suggests to audiences that Native peoples can be dissipated into sameness and are resources that can be known and owned. Finally, I argue that influential Anglo nature writers at the end of the twentieth century encourage their audiences to experience relationships with Native peoples that are marked by exploring both similarities and differences---a non-identification. However, although such non-identifications should open possibilities for white audiences and writers to listen to and learn from Indigenous eco-orientations, I also demonstrate how influential twenty-first century non-Native nature writers continue to write for white readers primarily about "the Native," without letting Indigenous peoples speak and be heard on their own terms and in their own words. Therefore, although non-identification is theorized as a first step towards genuine engagement and rhetorical listening, twenty-first century non-Native nature writing has not achieved this important objective of rhetorical listening in its construction of Native peoples. Through my analysis of each period, I illustrate how the kind of identification predominantly used in that period made sense given the political and cultural context of the time. However, in each era I analyze, authors also sow seeds for different kinds of identifications (for example, although Anglo writers of the mid-nineteenth century encouraged their white readers to construct disidentifications with Native peoples, there are seeds of consubstantial identifications). This dissertation thus ends with a consideration of how non-Native environmental writers can encourage their audiences to listen rhetorically to and construct more active non-identifications with Native writers and with Native writing on the environment in the hope that such an approach can encourage a wider range of possible relationships with and conceptions of our environment.
590 $a School code: 0263.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Environmental philosophy. $3 3168296
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0392
690 $a 0740
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. $b English. $3 3176551
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-05A(E).
790 $a 0263
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10245445