東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perp...

Model, Katherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perpetrators, and the Documentary Interview.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perpetrators, and the Documentary Interview./
作者:	Model, Katherine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	264 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-07A(E).
標題:	Film studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10025684
ISBN:	9781339521350

Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perpetrators, and the Documentary Interview.
Model, Katherine.

Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perpetrators, and the Documentary Interview. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 264 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2016.

This dissertation examines how the documentary landscape changes when the interviewees' credibility is at stake---as is the case with perpetrator interviews. In others words, what happens when the film leads us to distrust the interviewee? Or when, although the interviewee may claim to speak the truth, we think or know otherwise? Or when the testimony we are privy to is rife with prevarications, partial truths and denials?

ISBN: 9781339521350Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122736
Film studies.

Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perpetrators, and the Documentary Interview.
LDR:03180nmm a2200301 4500 001 2118313
005 20170605115644.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339521350
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10025684
035 $a AAI10025684
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Model, Katherine. $3 3280141
245 1 0 $a Documenting Denial: Atrocities, Perpetrators, and the Documentary Interview.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 264 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Stam.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2016.
520 $a This dissertation examines how the documentary landscape changes when the interviewees' credibility is at stake---as is the case with perpetrator interviews. In others words, what happens when the film leads us to distrust the interviewee? Or when, although the interviewee may claim to speak the truth, we think or know otherwise? Or when the testimony we are privy to is rife with prevarications, partial truths and denials?
520 $a I argue that to take on these questions we need a different way to analyze interview-based documentaries? through examination of the filmic space. The documentary interview's filmic space, as I am conceiving it, arises from a combination of the interviewee's words and performance, the interventions of the interviewer (questions, tone of voice, body language etc.), the choices made by the filmmaker (staging, camerawork, lighting, editing etc.) and the viewer's attitude and assumptions. These forces can work in concert to create an impression of unity when we trust the interviewee; or they can pull in separate directions, giving rise to a space that we experience as ruptured, layered, fragmented, haunted or uncanny. The filmic space of the documentary interview is always shifting as a result of the interplay between word and image. It bears resemblance to the profilmic, but is not the same. Rather, it comes into being only in its unfolding, requiring the viewer to complete it. In this process a new visual space is created, which differs from that of a face-to-face unmediated encounter.
520 $a While trustworthy interviewees tend to be filmic space unifiers (with them, the setting recedes to the background and appears cohesive), untrustworthy interviewees are potent space disturbers. In my study of interview documentaries, I focus on denial in subjects implicated in historical atrocities, chiefly the Holocaust. Interviews with perpetrators teem with disruptive potential; in the Western world the Nazi remains the ultimate perpetrator. Furthermore the testimonial form and the Holocaust have been intertwined since the Adolf Eichmann trial. I examine how the filmic interview space carries with it the imprint of Holocaust documentaries when it moves to other atrocities---most powerfully, the Israeli occupation of Palestine.
590 $a School code: 0146.
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
690 $a 0900
710 2 $a New York University. $b Cinema Studies. $3 1022523
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-07A(E).
790 $a 0146
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10025684