東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Impact of self-selected versus presc...

Assi, Manal M.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Impact of self-selected versus prescribed level reading on Arabic speaking ELL students: A mixed methods study.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Impact of self-selected versus prescribed level reading on Arabic speaking ELL students: A mixed methods study./
Author:	Assi, Manal M.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	115 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
Subject:	Bilingual education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10105048
ISBN:	9781339685632

Impact of self-selected versus prescribed level reading on Arabic speaking ELL students: A mixed methods study.
Assi, Manal M.

Impact of self-selected versus prescribed level reading on Arabic speaking ELL students: A mixed methods study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 115 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Wayne State University, 2016.

This study uses the Accelerated Reader collection to find which reading model, reading within the Lexile range versus having the choice to read outside the Lexile range, will positively impact Arabic speaking eighth grade ELL students and improve their attitude towards reading. The study was conducted in a Title III charter school in the metro-Detroit area. Participants included six female eighth grade students whose native language was Arabic. The mixed-method approach was adapted using qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data included observations and semi-structured interviews; quantitative data included The Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) computerized adaptive reading assessment and the Reader Self-Perception Scale, which was developed by Henk and Melnick (1995). Results indicated that there was no significant difference between the two models on students' attitude towards reading nor was there a significant difference on students' reading growth. As a result, school policies that restrict students to read within their prescribed levels should be reconsidered. Each model could positively impact ELLs if an appropriate reading environment was established.

ISBN: 9781339685632Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122778
Bilingual education.

Impact of self-selected versus prescribed level reading on Arabic speaking ELL students: A mixed methods study.
LDR:02161nmm a2200301 4500 001 2118106
005 20170605151642.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339685632
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10105048
035 $a AAI10105048
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Assi, Manal M. $3 3279915
245 1 0 $a Impact of self-selected versus prescribed level reading on Arabic speaking ELL students: A mixed methods study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 115 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Sandra Gonzales.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Wayne State University, 2016.
520 $a This study uses the Accelerated Reader collection to find which reading model, reading within the Lexile range versus having the choice to read outside the Lexile range, will positively impact Arabic speaking eighth grade ELL students and improve their attitude towards reading. The study was conducted in a Title III charter school in the metro-Detroit area. Participants included six female eighth grade students whose native language was Arabic. The mixed-method approach was adapted using qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data included observations and semi-structured interviews; quantitative data included The Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) computerized adaptive reading assessment and the Reader Self-Perception Scale, which was developed by Henk and Melnick (1995). Results indicated that there was no significant difference between the two models on students' attitude towards reading nor was there a significant difference on students' reading growth. As a result, school policies that restrict students to read within their prescribed levels should be reconsidered. Each model could positively impact ELLs if an appropriate reading environment was established.
590 $a School code: 0254.
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0282
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 1673378
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
790 $a 0254
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10105048