東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Apologies for cross-posting: Composi...

Beare, Zachary Charles.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Apologies for cross-posting: Composing disciplinary affects and conflicts on the WPA Listserv.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Apologies for cross-posting: Composing disciplinary affects and conflicts on the WPA Listserv./
作者:	Beare, Zachary Charles.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	189 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-09A(E).
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264476
ISBN:	9781369694604

Apologies for cross-posting: Composing disciplinary affects and conflicts on the WPA Listserv.
Beare, Zachary Charles.

Apologies for cross-posting: Composing disciplinary affects and conflicts on the WPA Listserv. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 189 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2017.

Drawing on theories of counterpublics, online communication, and affect, this dissertation argues that the Writing Program Administrators Listserv (WPA-L) functions as an important site of disciplinary knowledge-making and theory-building for the field of Composition and Rhetoric. The dissertation examines the WPA-L as a discursive space in which members of the discipline build community, debate pressing issues, and strategize how best to advocate for their individual and collective interests. At the same time that these qualities reveal how the listserv functions as counterpublic space for the discipline at large, the dissertation argues that sub-disciplinary counterpublics made up of individuals marginalized within the field (graduate students, part-time and contingent faculty, two-year college specialists) can make use of the democratic nature of this digital platform to speak back to more powerful segments of the field. Thus, I argue that the WPA-L, gives voice to individuals not often afforded access to speak in more traditionally-authorized platforms of knowledge-making like peer-reviewed journals and monographs. In crafting this argument, I investigate the rhetorical moves employed by listserv participants in the three most active WPA-L threads of 2015 (examining a total of 180 listserv email messages). The dissertation concludes by reflecting on how the WPA-L embodies many qualities valued in the pedagogical theories of the field of Composition and Rhetoric.

ISBN: 9781369694604Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Apologies for cross-posting: Composing disciplinary affects and conflicts on the WPA Listserv.
LDR:02452nmm a2200301 4500 001 2117882
005 20170602084416.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369694604
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264476
035 $a AAI10264476
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Beare, Zachary Charles. $3 3279690
245 1 0 $a Apologies for cross-posting: Composing disciplinary affects and conflicts on the WPA Listserv.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 189 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Shari Stenberg.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2017.
520 $a Drawing on theories of counterpublics, online communication, and affect, this dissertation argues that the Writing Program Administrators Listserv (WPA-L) functions as an important site of disciplinary knowledge-making and theory-building for the field of Composition and Rhetoric. The dissertation examines the WPA-L as a discursive space in which members of the discipline build community, debate pressing issues, and strategize how best to advocate for their individual and collective interests. At the same time that these qualities reveal how the listserv functions as counterpublic space for the discipline at large, the dissertation argues that sub-disciplinary counterpublics made up of individuals marginalized within the field (graduate students, part-time and contingent faculty, two-year college specialists) can make use of the democratic nature of this digital platform to speak back to more powerful segments of the field. Thus, I argue that the WPA-L, gives voice to individuals not often afforded access to speak in more traditionally-authorized platforms of knowledge-making like peer-reviewed journals and monographs. In crafting this argument, I investigate the rhetorical moves employed by listserv participants in the three most active WPA-L threads of 2015 (examining a total of 180 listserv email messages). The dissertation concludes by reflecting on how the WPA-L embodies many qualities valued in the pedagogical theories of the field of Composition and Rhetoric.
590 $a School code: 0138.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Sociolinguistics. $3 524467
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b English. $3 1037306
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-09A(E).
790 $a 0138
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264476