東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Frontal Assessment Battery and d...

Richards, Rebecca L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Frontal Assessment Battery and differential diagnosis of dementia: A meta-analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Frontal Assessment Battery and differential diagnosis of dementia: A meta-analysis./
作者:	Richards, Rebecca L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2011,
面頁冊數:	88 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: B, page: 4506.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-07B.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3415602
ISBN:	9781124096773

The Frontal Assessment Battery and differential diagnosis of dementia: A meta-analysis.
Richards, Rebecca L.

The Frontal Assessment Battery and differential diagnosis of dementia: A meta-analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2011 - 88 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: B, page: 4506.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Antioch University New England, 2011.

An aging global population predicts a dramatic increase in dementia diagnoses during the next 20-40 years, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounting for the majority of cases. Accurate diagnosis of AD requires that it be distinguished from frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a syndrome with similar clinical and cognitive features but different underlying neuropathology, prognosis, and treatment protocols. This study is a meta-analysis examining the utility of the Frontal Assessment Battery for differentiating AD and FTD patient groups. Nine studies involving 558 participants were selected based on two inclusion criteria: a diagnosis of AD or FTD and the provision of FAB composite and subtest score data. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for all composite score comparisons and seven subtest comparisons. Degree of cognitive impairment was used as a moderator to control for heterogeneity of composite score effects, resulting in two homogeneous and one heterogeneous subgroup of studies from which averaged effects were drawn (Group 1, d = -1.77; Group 3, d = -0.21). Subtest analyses resulted in two homogeneous effects (Similarities, d= -0.51 and Lexical Fluency, d = -0.36, respectively). Overall, results of composite and subtest analyses suggest that the FAB is inconsistent in its ability to detect meaningful differences in performance between AD and FTD patient groups, and therefore, its routine use in clinical practice for this purpose is not recommended.

ISBN: 9781124096773Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.

The Frontal Assessment Battery and differential diagnosis of dementia: A meta-analysis.
LDR:02407nmm a2200289 4500 001 2117161
005 20170509115851.5
008 180830s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124096773
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3415602
035 $a AAI3415602
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Richards, Rebecca L. $3 3278919
245 1 4 $a The Frontal Assessment Battery and differential diagnosis of dementia: A meta-analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2011
300 $a 88 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: B, page: 4506.
500 $a Adviser: Martha Straus.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Antioch University New England, 2011.
520 $a An aging global population predicts a dramatic increase in dementia diagnoses during the next 20-40 years, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounting for the majority of cases. Accurate diagnosis of AD requires that it be distinguished from frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a syndrome with similar clinical and cognitive features but different underlying neuropathology, prognosis, and treatment protocols. This study is a meta-analysis examining the utility of the Frontal Assessment Battery for differentiating AD and FTD patient groups. Nine studies involving 558 participants were selected based on two inclusion criteria: a diagnosis of AD or FTD and the provision of FAB composite and subtest score data. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for all composite score comparisons and seven subtest comparisons. Degree of cognitive impairment was used as a moderator to control for heterogeneity of composite score effects, resulting in two homogeneous and one heterogeneous subgroup of studies from which averaged effects were drawn (Group 1, d = -1.77; Group 3, d = -0.21). Subtest analyses resulted in two homogeneous effects (Similarities, d= -0.51 and Lexical Fluency, d = -0.36, respectively). Overall, results of composite and subtest analyses suggest that the FAB is inconsistent in its ability to detect meaningful differences in performance between AD and FTD patient groups, and therefore, its routine use in clinical practice for this purpose is not recommended.
590 $a School code: 1595.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Antioch University New England. $3 1671666
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-07B.
790 $a 1595
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3415602