東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Power in collaborative networks.

Joosse, Alexandra P.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Power in collaborative networks.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Power in collaborative networks./
作者:	Joosse, Alexandra P.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	197 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01A(E).
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3720146
ISBN:	9781339008684

Power in collaborative networks.
Joosse, Alexandra P.

Power in collaborative networks. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 197 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2015.

The research described herein focuses on understanding the effects of power on the processes and outcomes of collaborative networks. Power is conceptualized from a structural perspective, as the dependence that exists in the relationships that tie network participants together. Using the method of social network analysis, the dissertation first validates a measure of structural power in collaborative networks, betweenness centrality. It then examines the effect of uneven distributions of structural power among participants on an important variable for these networks: cohesion as measured from a behavioral perspective. This effect is examined from the perspective of two levels of analysis: the whole network level and the working group level. Results indicate that structural power has a variable effect on cohesion, depending on the level of analysis. At the whole network level, uneven distributions of power negatively affect the cohesive behavior of participants. At the working group level, on the other hand, the relationship between the variables is curvilinear. Finally, the effect of structural power on three dimensions of participant satisfaction is examined: process satisfaction, human capital satisfaction, and outcome satisfaction. The research finds that being in a power disadvantaged position affects how participants rate their satisfaction with the process of collaboration.

ISBN: 9781339008684Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.

Power in collaborative networks.
LDR:02292nmm a2200301 4500 001 2116581
005 20170428103042.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339008684
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3720146
035 $a AAI3720146
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Joosse, Alexandra P. $3 3278314
245 1 0 $a Power in collaborative networks.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 197 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: H. Brinton Milward.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2015.
520 $a The research described herein focuses on understanding the effects of power on the processes and outcomes of collaborative networks. Power is conceptualized from a structural perspective, as the dependence that exists in the relationships that tie network participants together. Using the method of social network analysis, the dissertation first validates a measure of structural power in collaborative networks, betweenness centrality. It then examines the effect of uneven distributions of structural power among participants on an important variable for these networks: cohesion as measured from a behavioral perspective. This effect is examined from the perspective of two levels of analysis: the whole network level and the working group level. Results indicate that structural power has a variable effect on cohesion, depending on the level of analysis. At the whole network level, uneven distributions of power negatively affect the cohesive behavior of participants. At the working group level, on the other hand, the relationship between the variables is curvilinear. Finally, the effect of structural power on three dimensions of participant satisfaction is examined: process satisfaction, human capital satisfaction, and outcome satisfaction. The research finds that being in a power disadvantaged position affects how participants rate their satisfaction with the process of collaboration.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Social structure. $3 528995
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0700
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Political Science. $3 1270079
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01A(E).
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3720146