東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Cultural Worldview, Psychological Di...

Singh, Ajay Sarangdevot.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Cultural Worldview, Psychological Distance, and Americans' Support for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cultural Worldview, Psychological Distance, and Americans' Support for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy./
作者:	Singh, Ajay Sarangdevot.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11A(E).
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3710398
ISBN:	9781321862553

Cultural Worldview, Psychological Distance, and Americans' Support for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy.
Singh, Ajay Sarangdevot.

Cultural Worldview, Psychological Distance, and Americans' Support for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2015.

Article 2 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) sets an objective for members of the Conference of the Parties to stabilize greenhouse gases concentrations to "prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system." Meeting this objective assumes humans have a significant effect on climate and those changes will lead threats to humans and the environment. Implementing the UNFCCC and subsequent protocols will require members of the Conference of Parties to ratify binding agreements which set emission standards and establish mechanisms to mitigate those emissions to prevent dangerous interference with the climate system or increase society's ability to adapt to changes in order to avoid danger. Creating and adopting agreements at the Federal level in the United States has proved difficult. Opposition to ratifying protocols and amendments agreed upon by other COP members or adopting policies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions can be explained by various social, political, and psychological factors. The purpose of this dissertation is to continue an exploration of how cultural worldviews and psychological distance of climate impacts influences levels of support for mitigation and adaptation approaches to addressing climate change.

ISBN: 9781321862553Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.

Cultural Worldview, Psychological Distance, and Americans' Support for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy.
LDR:02321nmm a2200325 4500 001 2116575
005 20170428103040.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321862553
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3710398
035 $a AAI3710398
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Singh, Ajay Sarangdevot. $3 3278308
245 1 0 $a Cultural Worldview, Psychological Distance, and Americans' Support for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Jeremy Bruskotter; Tomas Koontz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2015.
520 $a Article 2 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) sets an objective for members of the Conference of the Parties to stabilize greenhouse gases concentrations to "prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system." Meeting this objective assumes humans have a significant effect on climate and those changes will lead threats to humans and the environment. Implementing the UNFCCC and subsequent protocols will require members of the Conference of Parties to ratify binding agreements which set emission standards and establish mechanisms to mitigate those emissions to prevent dangerous interference with the climate system or increase society's ability to adapt to changes in order to avoid danger. Creating and adopting agreements at the Federal level in the United States has proved difficult. Opposition to ratifying protocols and amendments agreed upon by other COP members or adopting policies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions can be explained by various social, political, and psychological factors. The purpose of this dissertation is to continue an exploration of how cultural worldviews and psychological distance of climate impacts influences levels of support for mitigation and adaptation approaches to addressing climate change.
590 $a School code: 0168.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0404
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $b Environment and Natural Resources. $3 3185293
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11A(E).
790 $a 0168
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3710398