東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Were children left behind? Essays on...

Davidson, Elizabeth Kate.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Were children left behind? Essays on the impact of No Child Left Behind on state policy and school closure.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Were children left behind? Essays on the impact of No Child Left Behind on state policy and school closure./
作者:	Davidson, Elizabeth Kate.
面頁冊數:	185 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-03A(E).
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10181561
ISBN:	9781369301465

Were children left behind? Essays on the impact of No Child Left Behind on state policy and school closure.
Davidson, Elizabeth Kate.

Were children left behind? Essays on the impact of No Child Left Behind on state policy and school closure. - 185 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

Since 2002, the rules and regulations of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act have dictated state and local education policy, influenced state and local reform efforts, and led to significant investments in building the capacity of state and local education agencies to meet its mandates. Using a nationally comprehensive data set on school- and student subgroup-level NCLB outcomes, these three studies are the first national studies exploring the ways in which state officials' interpretations of NCLB policy led to significant cross-state variation in school and subgroup outcomes across the country. I also investigate the extent to which NCLB accountability pressures and incentive structures led state and local officials to use school closure as a remedy for schools' persistence poor performance. I conduct the latter analysis for all U.S. public schools and separately for a subset of U.S. public schools, all U.S. charters schools, in order to account for the idiosyncrasies of charter school governance and oversight. I find that significant cross-state variation in the share of schools identified as "failing" according to NCLB rules can largely be explained by variation in states' NCLB implementation decisions, and that schools determined to have "failed" according to NCLB rules are more likely to close than schools that never "failed." For all public schools and for charter schools only, a school determined to have "failed" according to NCLB rules is significantly more likely to close than a school determined to have never "failed." Combined, these studies provide insight into the ways in which states' NCLB implementation decisions had significant and lasting impact on school outcomes and state and local reforms.

ISBN: 9781369301465Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.

Were children left behind? Essays on the impact of No Child Left Behind on state policy and school closure.
LDR:02640nmm a2200277 4500 001 2116218
005 20170417135100.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369301465
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10181561
035 $a AAI10181561
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Davidson, Elizabeth Kate. $3 3277914
245 1 0 $a Were children left behind? Essays on the impact of No Child Left Behind on state policy and school closure.
300 $a 185 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Randall Reback.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a Since 2002, the rules and regulations of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act have dictated state and local education policy, influenced state and local reform efforts, and led to significant investments in building the capacity of state and local education agencies to meet its mandates. Using a nationally comprehensive data set on school- and student subgroup-level NCLB outcomes, these three studies are the first national studies exploring the ways in which state officials' interpretations of NCLB policy led to significant cross-state variation in school and subgroup outcomes across the country. I also investigate the extent to which NCLB accountability pressures and incentive structures led state and local officials to use school closure as a remedy for schools' persistence poor performance. I conduct the latter analysis for all U.S. public schools and separately for a subset of U.S. public schools, all U.S. charters schools, in order to account for the idiosyncrasies of charter school governance and oversight. I find that significant cross-state variation in the share of schools identified as "failing" according to NCLB rules can largely be explained by variation in states' NCLB implementation decisions, and that schools determined to have "failed" according to NCLB rules are more likely to close than schools that never "failed." For all public schools and for charter schools only, a school determined to have "failed" according to NCLB rules is significantly more likely to close than a school determined to have never "failed." Combined, these studies provide insight into the ways in which states' NCLB implementation decisions had significant and lasting impact on school outcomes and state and local reforms.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0501
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b TC: Economics and Education. $3 1677420
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-03A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10181561