東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The historical reception of Japanese...

Kriegel-Nicholas, Isadora.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The historical reception of Japanese cinema at Cahiers du cinema: 1951-1961.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The historical reception of Japanese cinema at Cahiers du cinema: 1951-1961./
作者:	Kriegel-Nicholas, Isadora.
面頁冊數:	332 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-12A(E).
標題:	Film studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10147153
ISBN:	9781369024425

The historical reception of Japanese cinema at Cahiers du cinema: 1951-1961.
Kriegel-Nicholas, Isadora.

The historical reception of Japanese cinema at Cahiers du cinema: 1951-1961. - 332 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2016.

This dissertation documents and analyzes the reception of Japanese films in the French film journals of the 1950s, when postwar Paris was awash with cinephilia. The foremost of those journals, Cahiers du cinema, began publication in 1951, the same year as Japanese cinema's breakthrough into international film culture with the surprise victory of Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon at the Venice Film Festival. Previous scholarship has amply credited the critics at Cahiers with reinventing the tenets of film criticism and launching the French New Wave, but without focused attention on the Japanese case. Meanwhile, reception studies of Japanese cinema in the postwar West have tended to concentrate on the United States' hegemonic position vis-a-vis the Japanese film industry. Entwining those two strands, I investigate how Cahiers' sustained but selective engagement with Japanese cinema fueled intergenerational conflicts within the journal and debates with rival journal Positif, helped crystallize the key tenets of auteur theory and mise-en-scene, and navigated between orientalist notions of authentic national cinema and the vexed ideal of cinema as a universal language. In addition to mining the film journals, I draw on the rich archive of the Cinematheque Francaise for unpublished quantitative data and correspondence related to screenings of Japanese films and Japan's entries in the European film festival circuit, especially Cannes. This factual record underscores my argument that the French critics used Japanese cinema subjectively as a malleable canvas for limning their own partisan aesthetics and passionate advocacy for cinema as the seventh art. After setting the scene of 1950s cinephilia, I trace Cahiers' encounter with the unknown of Japanese cinema which resulted in reactions from stunned amazement, through enthusiastic viewership and awareness of Japan's already thriving film industry, to reaction against the exotic seductions of Japanese films suspected of having been made solely for export to the West. In particular, I show how Cahiers' championing of the "incomparable" Kenji Mizoguchi as the first non-Western director admitted to their pantheon of world-class auteurs emerged from a decade of polarizing head-to-head comparisons with Mizoguchi's increasingly disparaged countryman Kurosawa. My transregional approach thus taps and commends a fertile vein in historicocritical film studies.

ISBN: 9781369024425Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122736
Film studies.

The historical reception of Japanese cinema at Cahiers du cinema: 1951-1961.
LDR:03336nmm a2200289 4500 001 2116028
005 20170417092340.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369024425
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10147153
035 $a AAI10147153
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kriegel-Nicholas, Isadora. $3 3277711
245 1 4 $a The historical reception of Japanese cinema at Cahiers du cinema: 1951-1961.
300 $a 332 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Jefferson T. Kline; Susan Jackson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2016.
520 $a This dissertation documents and analyzes the reception of Japanese films in the French film journals of the 1950s, when postwar Paris was awash with cinephilia. The foremost of those journals, Cahiers du cinema, began publication in 1951, the same year as Japanese cinema's breakthrough into international film culture with the surprise victory of Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon at the Venice Film Festival. Previous scholarship has amply credited the critics at Cahiers with reinventing the tenets of film criticism and launching the French New Wave, but without focused attention on the Japanese case. Meanwhile, reception studies of Japanese cinema in the postwar West have tended to concentrate on the United States' hegemonic position vis-a-vis the Japanese film industry. Entwining those two strands, I investigate how Cahiers' sustained but selective engagement with Japanese cinema fueled intergenerational conflicts within the journal and debates with rival journal Positif, helped crystallize the key tenets of auteur theory and mise-en-scene, and navigated between orientalist notions of authentic national cinema and the vexed ideal of cinema as a universal language. In addition to mining the film journals, I draw on the rich archive of the Cinematheque Francaise for unpublished quantitative data and correspondence related to screenings of Japanese films and Japan's entries in the European film festival circuit, especially Cannes. This factual record underscores my argument that the French critics used Japanese cinema subjectively as a malleable canvas for limning their own partisan aesthetics and passionate advocacy for cinema as the seventh art. After setting the scene of 1950s cinephilia, I trace Cahiers' encounter with the unknown of Japanese cinema which resulted in reactions from stunned amazement, through enthusiastic viewership and awareness of Japan's already thriving film industry, to reaction against the exotic seductions of Japanese films suspected of having been made solely for export to the West. In particular, I show how Cahiers' championing of the "incomparable" Kenji Mizoguchi as the first non-Western director admitted to their pantheon of world-class auteurs emerged from a decade of polarizing head-to-head comparisons with Mizoguchi's increasingly disparaged countryman Kurosawa. My transregional approach thus taps and commends a fertile vein in historicocritical film studies.
590 $a School code: 0017.
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1571829
650 4 $a Art criticism. $3 526357
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0365
710 2 $a Boston University. $b French Language and Literatures. $3 3277712
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-12A(E).
790 $a 0017
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10147153