東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax.

Kleps, Daphne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax./
作者:	Kleps, Daphne.
面頁冊數:	340 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A, page: 2501.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-07A.
標題:	Classical literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3364124
ISBN:	9781109240191

Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax.
Kleps, Daphne.

Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax. - 340 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A, page: 2501.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2009.

The paratactic and appositional nature of Homeric Greek syntax, as compared with Classical Greek syntax, is currently explained in two different ways. According to the archaism theory, originally proposed in the context of late 19th and early 20th century research into comparative-historical grammar, Homeric language preserves features of an early syntactic typology in which this way of constructing and combining clauses is not primarily an aspect of a particular poetic style but rather a standard feature of ordinary everyday language According to the orality theory, originally proposed in the context of early 20 th century research on oral poetics, it is primarily the particular way in which the Homeric poems were composed and performed that is responsible for these features. The first two chapters of this dissertation are focused on reframing the archaism and orality theories in light of comparative evidence from late 20th century linguistic work on crosslinguistic syntax and structural differences between spoken and written language, and particularly on identifying areas where the two theories thus reframed make different predictions about what sorts of structural differences should exist between Homeric and Classical Greek; the final two chapters are focused on an analysis and comparison of Homeric and Classical Greek mechanisms of quantification that provides new evidence in support of the archaism theory.

ISBN: 9781109240191Subjects--Topical Terms:

595959
Classical literature.

Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax.
LDR:02292nmm a2200289 4500 001 2115459
005 20170313072601.5
008 180830s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109240191
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3364124
035 $a AAI3364124
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kleps, Daphne. $3 3277109
245 1 0 $a Archaism and orality in Homeric syntax.
300 $a 340 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A, page: 2501.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew Devine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2009.
520 $a The paratactic and appositional nature of Homeric Greek syntax, as compared with Classical Greek syntax, is currently explained in two different ways. According to the archaism theory, originally proposed in the context of late 19th and early 20th century research into comparative-historical grammar, Homeric language preserves features of an early syntactic typology in which this way of constructing and combining clauses is not primarily an aspect of a particular poetic style but rather a standard feature of ordinary everyday language According to the orality theory, originally proposed in the context of early 20 th century research on oral poetics, it is primarily the particular way in which the Homeric poems were composed and performed that is responsible for these features. The first two chapters of this dissertation are focused on reframing the archaism and orality theories in light of comparative evidence from late 20th century linguistic work on crosslinguistic syntax and structural differences between spoken and written language, and particularly on identifying areas where the two theories thus reframed make different predictions about what sorts of structural differences should exist between Homeric and Classical Greek; the final two chapters are focused on an analysis and comparison of Homeric and Classical Greek mechanisms of quantification that provides new evidence in support of the archaism theory.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Classical literature. $3 595959
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Ancient languages. $3 2122823
690 $a 0294
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0289
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-07A.
790 $a 0212
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3364124