東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Process Oriented Guid...

Judd, William Lindsey.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning on Secondary Student ACT Science Scores.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning on Secondary Student ACT Science Scores./
作者:	Judd, William Lindsey.
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-01A(E).
標題:	Science education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582793
ISBN:	9781321221824

The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning on Secondary Student ACT Science Scores.
Judd, William Lindsey.

The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning on Secondary Student ACT Science Scores. - 92 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Union University, 2014.

The purpose of this study was to examine any significant difference on secondary school chemistry students' ACT Science Test scores between students taught by the Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) method versus students taught by traditional, teacher-centered pedagogy. This study also examined any difference between students taught by the POGIL method versus students taught by traditional, teacher-centered pedagogy in regard to the three different types of questions on the ACT Science Test: data representation, research summaries, and conflicting viewpoints. The sample consisted of sophomore-level students at two private, suburban Christian schools. A pretest-posttest design was used to compare the mean difference in scores from ACT issued sample test booklets before and after each group had received instruction via the POGIL method or more traditional methods. This study found that there was no significant difference in the mean difference of test scores between the two groups. This study also found that there was not a significant difference in the mean difference of scores in regard to the three different types of questions on the ACT Science Test. Further implications of this study are discussed.

ISBN: 9781321221824Subjects--Topical Terms:

521340
Science education.

The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning on Secondary Student ACT Science Scores.
LDR:02162nmm a2200301 4500 001 2115360
005 20170228070202.5
008 180830s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321221824
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3582793
035 $a AAI3582793
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Judd, William Lindsey. $3 3277007
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning on Secondary Student ACT Science Scores.
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Stephanie Steele.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Union University, 2014.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine any significant difference on secondary school chemistry students' ACT Science Test scores between students taught by the Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) method versus students taught by traditional, teacher-centered pedagogy. This study also examined any difference between students taught by the POGIL method versus students taught by traditional, teacher-centered pedagogy in regard to the three different types of questions on the ACT Science Test: data representation, research summaries, and conflicting viewpoints. The sample consisted of sophomore-level students at two private, suburban Christian schools. A pretest-posttest design was used to compare the mean difference in scores from ACT issued sample test booklets before and after each group had received instruction via the POGIL method or more traditional methods. This study found that there was no significant difference in the mean difference of test scores between the two groups. This study also found that there was not a significant difference in the mean difference of scores in regard to the three different types of questions on the ACT Science Test. Further implications of this study are discussed.
590 $a School code: 1485.
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a Union University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 2105122
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-01A(E).
790 $a 1485
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582793