東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Commercialization of universities' i...

Prets, Richard A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Commercialization of universities' intellectual property: Evaluating productivity based on structure, research funding, and entrepreneurial aspirations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Commercialization of universities' intellectual property: Evaluating productivity based on structure, research funding, and entrepreneurial aspirations./
作者:	Prets, Richard A.
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-08A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10045879
ISBN:	9781339560700

Commercialization of universities' intellectual property: Evaluating productivity based on structure, research funding, and entrepreneurial aspirations.
Prets, Richard A.

Commercialization of universities' intellectual property: Evaluating productivity based on structure, research funding, and entrepreneurial aspirations. - 141 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Sam Houston State University, 2015.

Purpose The purpose of this journal-ready dissertation was to provide timely information to technology transfer professionals that may lead to more productive policies and practices in the commercialization of universities' intellectual property. This investigation provided insights regarding the sources and the productivity of academic research funding. The characteristics and activities of highly performing Technology Transfer Offices were highlighted in this study. The final objective was to determine the effectiveness of industry-university commercial partnerships.

ISBN: 9781339560700Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

Commercialization of universities' intellectual property: Evaluating productivity based on structure, research funding, and entrepreneurial aspirations.
LDR:03766nmm a2200349 4500 001 2114955
005 20161114124727.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339560700
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10045879
035 $a AAI10045879
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Prets, Richard A. $3 3276574
245 1 0 $a Commercialization of universities' intellectual property: Evaluating productivity based on structure, research funding, and entrepreneurial aspirations.
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: John R. Slate.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Sam Houston State University, 2015.
520 $a Purpose The purpose of this journal-ready dissertation was to provide timely information to technology transfer professionals that may lead to more productive policies and practices in the commercialization of universities' intellectual property. This investigation provided insights regarding the sources and the productivity of academic research funding. The characteristics and activities of highly performing Technology Transfer Offices were highlighted in this study. The final objective was to determine the effectiveness of industry-university commercial partnerships.
520 $a Method This study was conducted with non-experimental, causal-comparative, and correlational research designs (Creswell, 2009). Data from the Association of University Technology Managers' 2011, 2012, and recently released 2013 Licensing Activity Survey Questionnaires were obtained and analyzed through use of inferential statistical procedures. Respondents were technology transfer professionals and/or their designees.
520 $a Findings Study one was conducted to identify differences between public and private universities in sourcing research funding and in achieving commercialization success. In this investigation, private universities were more adept at procuring federal research funding than public universities. In addition, private research universities had generated a greater amount of licensing income for each dollar of research expenditure.
520 $a The second study was an investigation of the extent to which the licensing income of U.S. universities could be predicted by five questionnaire items (i.e., Number of Licensing Managers, Number of Licensing Agreements Executed, Number of U.S. Patents Issued, Total Research Expenditures, and Number of Start-Up Companies Initiated) chosen from the surveys. An All Possible Subsets regression analysis revealed that the Number of U.S. Patents Issued was the only statistically significant predictor of licensing income generated from universities' intellectual property for all three survey years analyzed in this investigation.
520 $a In study three, universities that had accepted equity in start-up companies had statistically significantly higher licensing revenue, in all three years analyzed in this investigation, than universities that did not accept equity positions in start-up ventures. In addition, the number of universities that accepted equity positions in start-up companies increased in each of the three years analyzed in this investigation. However, cashed-in equity fell, as a percentage of total licensing revenue, for the universities that had accepted equity in start-up ventures.
520 $a KEY WORDS: Universities' Intellectual Property, Commercialization, Technology Transfer.
590 $a School code: 0374.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Education finance. $3 3172165
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0277
710 2 $a Sam Houston State University. $3 1020273
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-08A(E).
790 $a 0374
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10045879