東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Are scientometric profiles hereditar...

Ni, Chaoqun.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences./
Author:	Ni, Chaoqun.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	269 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
Subject:	Information science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10103882
ISBN:	9781339674247

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.
Ni, Chaoqun.

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 269 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2016.

Doctoral mentoring plays an important role in the professional development and career trajectories of doctoral students, although little research exists quantifying the relationship between the scholarly practice and performance of doctoral advisees and their advisors. This dissertation proposes a set of analyses that explore the relationship between doctoral advisees and advisors in terms of their scholarly practice and performance---including publication, collaboration and citation patterns---based on massive and heterogeneous data sources. Economics, Political Science and Sociology are selected for the purpose of illustrating these relationships in the social sciences. Results show that advisees are more likely to learn from their advisors by imitating those aspects of scientometric profiles that are directly transferable, such as reference and collaboration patterns. For aspects that rely more on individual endeavor of advisees and where they exert less control, advisees are less likely to inherit from their advisors. Although disciplines investigated in this study show the general pattern mentioned above, the strength to which advisors and advisees are related in each aspect of scientometric profiles varies significantly among Economics, Political Science and Sociology. This study is unique in proposing a framework for analyzing the relationship between the scientometric profiles of advisors and advisees at a large scale and should shed light on future research regarding doctoral mentoring and intellectual capital reproduction of disciplines.

ISBN: 9781339674247Subjects--Topical Terms:

554358
Information science.

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.
LDR:02613nmm a2200325 4500 001 2111615
005 20180529094434.5
008 180626s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339674247
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10103882
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indiana:14058
035 $a AAI10103882
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ni, Chaoqun. $3 3265738
245 1 0 $a Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 269 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Cassidy R. Sugimoto.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2016.
520 $a Doctoral mentoring plays an important role in the professional development and career trajectories of doctoral students, although little research exists quantifying the relationship between the scholarly practice and performance of doctoral advisees and their advisors. This dissertation proposes a set of analyses that explore the relationship between doctoral advisees and advisors in terms of their scholarly practice and performance---including publication, collaboration and citation patterns---based on massive and heterogeneous data sources. Economics, Political Science and Sociology are selected for the purpose of illustrating these relationships in the social sciences. Results show that advisees are more likely to learn from their advisors by imitating those aspects of scientometric profiles that are directly transferable, such as reference and collaboration patterns. For aspects that rely more on individual endeavor of advisees and where they exert less control, advisees are less likely to inherit from their advisors. Although disciplines investigated in this study show the general pattern mentioned above, the strength to which advisors and advisees are related in each aspect of scientometric profiles varies significantly among Economics, Political Science and Sociology. This study is unique in proposing a framework for analyzing the relationship between the scientometric profiles of advisors and advisees at a large scale and should shed light on future research regarding doctoral mentoring and intellectual capital reproduction of disciplines.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0745
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $b Information Science. $3 1019032
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10103882