東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Mastery of Editing Pe...

Weber, Jennifer Danielle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Mastery of Editing Peers' Written Math Algorithms on Producing Effective Problem Solving Algorithms.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Mastery of Editing Peers' Written Math Algorithms on Producing Effective Problem Solving Algorithms./
作者:	Weber, Jennifer Danielle.
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09B(E).
標題:	Behavioral psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10108126
ISBN:	9781339715018

The Effects of Mastery of Editing Peers' Written Math Algorithms on Producing Effective Problem Solving Algorithms.
Weber, Jennifer Danielle.

The Effects of Mastery of Editing Peers' Written Math Algorithms on Producing Effective Problem Solving Algorithms. - 205 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

In 2 experiments, I tested the effects of a treatment package for teaching 4th graders to edit peers' written algorithms for solving math problems such that an adult naive reader could solve the problem. In Experiment 1, the editors were the target participants and the writers were the confederates. Participants were placed in a dyad that consisted of a writer and an editor. The writer and editor repeatedly interacted in writing until the writers produced an algorithm that resulted in adult naive readers solving the problem. The editor was supplied with a checklist as a prompt for the editing process. Each dyad competed against a second pair of students, using a peer-yoked contingency game board as a motivating operation. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the treatment package increased participants' accuracy of writing math algorithms, so that a naive reader could solve the math problems. The target participants acquired the verbally governed responses through peer editing alone, and as a result the participants produced written math algorithms. Experiment 2 measured the behaviors of the editor and writer using a multiple probe design across participants with two groups of 4 writers and 4 editors. The dependent variables were: 1) production of previously mastered math problems, such that a naive reader could read and solve the math problem without ever seeing the problem, 2) the emergence of explanations of "why" (function) from learning "how" to solve a multi-step math problem, 3) production of novel written math algorithms (i.e., find the perimeter and extended multiplication), and 4) cumulative number of untaught math problems attempted. The independent variable was the same as Experiment 1 except a) the editors did not have access to a checklist and b) the peer-yoked contingency game board was removed. The results demonstrated that all participants produced written math algorithms such that both the writers and editors affected the behavior of naive readers. I discuss the emergence of explanations of the function ("why") of math that occurred as a result of being able to explain "how" to solve problems. Moreover, the participants attempted more untaught math problems, demonstrating the resistance to extinction for attempting untaught math problems. Findings suggest that as a function of the intervention, reinforcement for solving math problems was enhanced.

ISBN: 9781339715018Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122788
Behavioral psychology.

The Effects of Mastery of Editing Peers' Written Math Algorithms on Producing Effective Problem Solving Algorithms.
LDR:03313nmm a2200277 4500 001 2079006
005 20161128143924.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339715018
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10108126
035 $a AAI10108126
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Weber, Jennifer Danielle. $3 3194651
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Mastery of Editing Peers' Written Math Algorithms on Producing Effective Problem Solving Algorithms.
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: R. Douglas Greer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a In 2 experiments, I tested the effects of a treatment package for teaching 4th graders to edit peers' written algorithms for solving math problems such that an adult naive reader could solve the problem. In Experiment 1, the editors were the target participants and the writers were the confederates. Participants were placed in a dyad that consisted of a writer and an editor. The writer and editor repeatedly interacted in writing until the writers produced an algorithm that resulted in adult naive readers solving the problem. The editor was supplied with a checklist as a prompt for the editing process. Each dyad competed against a second pair of students, using a peer-yoked contingency game board as a motivating operation. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the treatment package increased participants' accuracy of writing math algorithms, so that a naive reader could solve the math problems. The target participants acquired the verbally governed responses through peer editing alone, and as a result the participants produced written math algorithms. Experiment 2 measured the behaviors of the editor and writer using a multiple probe design across participants with two groups of 4 writers and 4 editors. The dependent variables were: 1) production of previously mastered math problems, such that a naive reader could read and solve the math problem without ever seeing the problem, 2) the emergence of explanations of "why" (function) from learning "how" to solve a multi-step math problem, 3) production of novel written math algorithms (i.e., find the perimeter and extended multiplication), and 4) cumulative number of untaught math problems attempted. The independent variable was the same as Experiment 1 except a) the editors did not have access to a checklist and b) the peer-yoked contingency game board was removed. The results demonstrated that all participants produced written math algorithms such that both the writers and editors affected the behavior of naive readers. I discuss the emergence of explanations of the function ("why") of math that occurred as a result of being able to explain "how" to solve problems. Moreover, the participants attempted more untaught math problems, demonstrating the resistance to extinction for attempting untaught math problems. Findings suggest that as a function of the intervention, reinforcement for solving math problems was enhanced.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0280
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Applied Behavioral Analysis. $3 3172576
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09B(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10108126