東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Patient Responses To Swallowing Safe...

Cassel, Stacy Gallese.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Patient Responses To Swallowing Safety Cues: A Comparison Of Traditional Face-To-Face And Tele-Dysphagia Instructional Methods.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Patient Responses To Swallowing Safety Cues: A Comparison Of Traditional Face-To-Face And Tele-Dysphagia Instructional Methods./
作者:	Cassel, Stacy Gallese.
面頁冊數:	112 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-07B(E).
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10011437
ISBN:	9781339472652

Patient Responses To Swallowing Safety Cues: A Comparison Of Traditional Face-To-Face And Tele-Dysphagia Instructional Methods.
Cassel, Stacy Gallese.

Patient Responses To Swallowing Safety Cues: A Comparison Of Traditional Face-To-Face And Tele-Dysphagia Instructional Methods. - 112 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

An estimated 15 million individuals in the United States have been formally diagnosed with dysphagia, defined as swallowing dysfunction -- the fifth leading cause of death in Americans over the age of 65. Statistical findings indicate that at least 50% of these individuals have limited access to treatment. However, despite the rapid expansion of telepractice (defined as the use of telecommunications technology to provide services at a distance) as a statistically valid online method for the provision of medical and clinical intervention to those without access, telepractice has yet to consistently incorporate online dysphagia service delivery (referred to as tele-dysphagia) into its clinical scope. This investigation compared the outcomes of traditional face-to-face intervention to online tele-dysphagia intervention by measuring the correct and incorrect responses to visual and auditory cues presented by a clinician during dysphagia intervention sessions. Data analysis conducted via t-test indicated that there was no significant difference in the mean scores from tele-dysphagia method (M = 9.67, SD = 3.74) as compared to face-to-face method (M = 9.00, SD = 2.70), t (28) = - 0.56, p = 0.580. Additionally, inter-rater reliability scores were obtained by determining a Cohen's kappa coefficient in order to measure the degree of agreement between the two raters. Findings indicated a kappa statistic of k=1 for all items, given a 100% agreement for all trials. Additionally, results of a mixed-design analysis of variance suggested a significant within-subject effect with the use of cues, but there were no significant main effects of between-subject factors (gender, delivery type, etiology, or age) on the patients' responses. Given that there was no significant statistical difference between the two delivery methods and inter-rater reliability scores demonstrated perfect agreement, we can suggest that the online tele-dysphagia method can potentially yield clinical outcomes similar to a traditional face-to-face method. Results from a mixed-design analysis of variance additionally suggested that there is a significant within-subject effect given the use of cues (F (1, 29)=14.99, p = .001) on patients' responses. However, there were no significant main effects of between-subject factors (gender, delivery type, etiology, or age) on the patients' responses. It is hoped that the results of this study will lend validity and direction to future attempts to provide much-needed dysphagia intervention via online service methods. Such attempts, in turn, would have the potential to promote increased longevity and quality of life in those populations currently unable to access such services.

ISBN: 9781339472652Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.

Patient Responses To Swallowing Safety Cues: A Comparison Of Traditional Face-To-Face And Tele-Dysphagia Instructional Methods.
LDR:03627nmm a2200265 4500 001 2078967
005 20161128143917.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339472652
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10011437
035 $a AAI10011437
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cassel, Stacy Gallese. $3 3194608
245 1 0 $a Patient Responses To Swallowing Safety Cues: A Comparison Of Traditional Face-To-Face And Tele-Dysphagia Instructional Methods.
300 $a 112 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: John H. Saxman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a An estimated 15 million individuals in the United States have been formally diagnosed with dysphagia, defined as swallowing dysfunction -- the fifth leading cause of death in Americans over the age of 65. Statistical findings indicate that at least 50% of these individuals have limited access to treatment. However, despite the rapid expansion of telepractice (defined as the use of telecommunications technology to provide services at a distance) as a statistically valid online method for the provision of medical and clinical intervention to those without access, telepractice has yet to consistently incorporate online dysphagia service delivery (referred to as tele-dysphagia) into its clinical scope. This investigation compared the outcomes of traditional face-to-face intervention to online tele-dysphagia intervention by measuring the correct and incorrect responses to visual and auditory cues presented by a clinician during dysphagia intervention sessions. Data analysis conducted via t-test indicated that there was no significant difference in the mean scores from tele-dysphagia method (M = 9.67, SD = 3.74) as compared to face-to-face method (M = 9.00, SD = 2.70), t (28) = - 0.56, p = 0.580. Additionally, inter-rater reliability scores were obtained by determining a Cohen's kappa coefficient in order to measure the degree of agreement between the two raters. Findings indicated a kappa statistic of k=1 for all items, given a 100% agreement for all trials. Additionally, results of a mixed-design analysis of variance suggested a significant within-subject effect with the use of cues, but there were no significant main effects of between-subject factors (gender, delivery type, etiology, or age) on the patients' responses. Given that there was no significant statistical difference between the two delivery methods and inter-rater reliability scores demonstrated perfect agreement, we can suggest that the online tele-dysphagia method can potentially yield clinical outcomes similar to a traditional face-to-face method. Results from a mixed-design analysis of variance additionally suggested that there is a significant within-subject effect given the use of cues (F (1, 29)=14.99, p = .001) on patients' responses. However, there were no significant main effects of between-subject factors (gender, delivery type, etiology, or age) on the patients' responses. It is hoped that the results of this study will lend validity and direction to future attempts to provide much-needed dysphagia intervention via online service methods. Such attempts, in turn, would have the potential to promote increased longevity and quality of life in those populations currently unable to access such services.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Speech and Language Pathology. $3 3194458
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-07B(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10011437