東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

One for all and all for one; Combatt...

Weldon, Kevin W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

One for all and all for one; Combatting human trafficking in East Africa by granting limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	One for all and all for one; Combatting human trafficking in East Africa by granting limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice./
作者:	Weldon, Kevin W.
面頁冊數:	98 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-05(E).
標題:	International law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10111455
ISBN:	9781339746647

One for all and all for one; Combatting human trafficking in East Africa by granting limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice.
Weldon, Kevin W.

One for all and all for one; Combatting human trafficking in East Africa by granting limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice. - 98 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.

Thesis (LL.M.)--Regent University, 2016.

This thesis proposes a regional protocol to be adopted by the East African Community (EAC) that creates a regional human trafficking law, grants limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice (EACJ), and promotes complementarity by allowing Partner States possessing a transnational criminal court to retain domestic jurisdiction over trafficking matters. This thesis addresses the current issue of human trafficking in the five Partner States of the East African Community---Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda. All five countries are currently considered both destination and source countries for human trafficking. In response to the issue of human trafficking in East Africa, the East African Legislative Assembly issued a proclamation in August 2015 calling for Partner States to increase efforts to combat and prosecute human traffickers. Additionally, there is currently support among Partner States to create a regional trafficking law and grant criminal authority to the East African Court of Justice. The call to establish a regional human trafficking law and grant limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice is addressed in Section I. While a regional solution is warranted, the bulk of work and change must be carried out at the Partner State level. A draft protocol establishing a regional trafficking law, granting criminal jurisdiction to the EACJ limited to human trafficking is proposed in Section II and included in the Appendix. This protocol creates a system of complementarity similar to that of the ICC allowing Partner States possessing a transnational court, such as Uganda's International Criminal Division (ICD) Court, to retain jurisdiction within the state. Partner States of the EAC have been reluctant to yield sovereignty over certain issues, including granting criminal jurisdiction to the EACJ. Section I evaluates the political history of the EAC and concludes that by allowing states the option of retaining jurisdiction if they establish a transnational court and limiting the jurisdiction of the EACJ to human trafficking issues, the Partner States will be more likely than not to ratify such a protocol. The current legal infrastructure of Partner States is analyzed including the process and challenges in the establishment of an international criminal division capable of handling transnational crimes. Section III discusses what a successful regional law looks like, addressing the establishment of a regional criminal court and the challenges that the EAC must overcome.

ISBN: 9781339746647Subjects--Topical Terms:

560784
International law.

One for all and all for one; Combatting human trafficking in East Africa by granting limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice.
LDR:03501nmm a2200289 4500 001 2078681
005 20161129073839.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339746647
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10111455
035 $a AAI10111455
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Weldon, Kevin W. $3 3194280
245 1 0 $a One for all and all for one; Combatting human trafficking in East Africa by granting limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice.
300 $a 98 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
500 $a Adviser: Bill Magee.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--Regent University, 2016.
520 $a This thesis proposes a regional protocol to be adopted by the East African Community (EAC) that creates a regional human trafficking law, grants limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice (EACJ), and promotes complementarity by allowing Partner States possessing a transnational criminal court to retain domestic jurisdiction over trafficking matters. This thesis addresses the current issue of human trafficking in the five Partner States of the East African Community---Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda. All five countries are currently considered both destination and source countries for human trafficking. In response to the issue of human trafficking in East Africa, the East African Legislative Assembly issued a proclamation in August 2015 calling for Partner States to increase efforts to combat and prosecute human traffickers. Additionally, there is currently support among Partner States to create a regional trafficking law and grant criminal authority to the East African Court of Justice. The call to establish a regional human trafficking law and grant limited criminal jurisdiction to the East African Court of Justice is addressed in Section I. While a regional solution is warranted, the bulk of work and change must be carried out at the Partner State level. A draft protocol establishing a regional trafficking law, granting criminal jurisdiction to the EACJ limited to human trafficking is proposed in Section II and included in the Appendix. This protocol creates a system of complementarity similar to that of the ICC allowing Partner States possessing a transnational court, such as Uganda's International Criminal Division (ICD) Court, to retain jurisdiction within the state. Partner States of the EAC have been reluctant to yield sovereignty over certain issues, including granting criminal jurisdiction to the EACJ. Section I evaluates the political history of the EAC and concludes that by allowing states the option of retaining jurisdiction if they establish a transnational court and limiting the jurisdiction of the EACJ to human trafficking issues, the Partner States will be more likely than not to ratify such a protocol. The current legal infrastructure of Partner States is analyzed including the process and challenges in the establishment of an international criminal division capable of handling transnational crimes. Section III discusses what a successful regional law looks like, addressing the establishment of a regional criminal court and the challenges that the EAC must overcome.
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a African studies. $3 2122725
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0293
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Regent University. $b School of Law. $3 3194277
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-05(E).
790 $a 1058
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10111455