東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Tho...

Hagen, Adrienne M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Thought.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Thought./
作者:	Hagen, Adrienne M.
面頁冊數:	249 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-10A(E).
標題:	Classical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10125638
ISBN:	9781339837109

Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Thought.
Hagen, Adrienne M.

Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Thought. - 249 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2016.

According to one worldview available during the late Roman Republic, the universe has a hierarchical structure: the gods are virtual monarchs who preside over human beings, while humans, in turn, are entitled to use subaltern creatures as they see fit. In this view, the capacity for reason is a defining characteristic of gods and humans, setting them apart from non-human animals and allowing them to exercise control over their environment. Those who either lack reason entirely or are unable to apply it correctly---non-human animals but also, in many cases, women and enslaved people---are subject to the whims of the reasoning few. This system of thought assumes that domination, more than cooperation, is the key to human progress. This dissertation uses the philosophical works of Cicero to represent this hierarchical worldview before turning to three other authors of the late Roman Republic---Lucretius, Diodorus Siculus, and Varro---who offer alternative ways of understanding the natural order and the place of humans in it. Each author depicts interactions between humans and the natural world, including relations with the other beings---bestial or divine---that inhabit it. They also depict the early stages of human life on earth and the development of technological and societal innovations. Unlike the hierarchical model that assumes reason to be a point of separation between humans and other features of nature, Lucretius, Diodorus Siculus, and Varro more often emphasize the integrity of the natural world (of which humans are just one part) and continuity between humans and other living creatures.

ISBN: 9781339837109Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122826
Classical studies.

Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Thought.
LDR:02497nmm a2200289 4500 001 2078593
005 20161129073718.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339837109
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10125638
035 $a AAI10125638
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hagen, Adrienne M. $3 3194188
245 1 0 $a Natural Hierarchy in Greco-Roman Thought.
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jeffrey Beneker.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2016.
520 $a According to one worldview available during the late Roman Republic, the universe has a hierarchical structure: the gods are virtual monarchs who preside over human beings, while humans, in turn, are entitled to use subaltern creatures as they see fit. In this view, the capacity for reason is a defining characteristic of gods and humans, setting them apart from non-human animals and allowing them to exercise control over their environment. Those who either lack reason entirely or are unable to apply it correctly---non-human animals but also, in many cases, women and enslaved people---are subject to the whims of the reasoning few. This system of thought assumes that domination, more than cooperation, is the key to human progress. This dissertation uses the philosophical works of Cicero to represent this hierarchical worldview before turning to three other authors of the late Roman Republic---Lucretius, Diodorus Siculus, and Varro---who offer alternative ways of understanding the natural order and the place of humans in it. Each author depicts interactions between humans and the natural world, including relations with the other beings---bestial or divine---that inhabit it. They also depict the early stages of human life on earth and the development of technological and societal innovations. Unlike the hierarchical model that assumes reason to be a point of separation between humans and other features of nature, Lucretius, Diodorus Siculus, and Varro more often emphasize the integrity of the natural world (of which humans are just one part) and continuity between humans and other living creatures.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Classical studies. $3 2122826
650 4 $a Classical literature. $3 595959
650 4 $a Environmental philosophy. $3 3168296
690 $a 0434
690 $a 0294
690 $a 0392
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Classics. $3 3181324
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-10A(E).
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10125638