東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Br...

McGovern, Nathan Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Brahmans: Negotiating Identities in Indian Antiquity.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Brahmans: Negotiating Identities in Indian Antiquity./
作者:	McGovern, Nathan Michael.
面頁冊數:	682 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-08A(E).
標題:	Religious history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3559822
ISBN:	9781303052521

Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Brahmans: Negotiating Identities in Indian Antiquity.
McGovern, Nathan Michael.

Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Brahmans: Negotiating Identities in Indian Antiquity. - 682 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

In this dissertation, I explore the way in which early Buddhists formed their own self-identity vis-a-vis Vedic Brahmans. Interestingly, while today we understand Buddhism and Hinduism as separate religions, and Brahmans as belonging to the latter religion, early Buddhist texts frequently refer to the Buddha, his enlightened disciples, or just the "ideal person" in the abstract as Brahmans. Many previous scholars have argued or assumed that the category "Brahman" was a term that belonged properly to the "Brahmanical tradition," whose roots long pre-date Buddhism, and thus concluded that early Buddhist uses of the word Brahman (brahman&dotbelow;a) should be interpreted as "borrowings" from the Brahmanical tradition, made for the purpose of polemic. I, however, argue that the word Brahman was a contested category that was not "owned" by a monolithic Brahmanical tradition and then borrowed by Buddhists to use polemically, but that it was a common honorific term that was actively contested by both Buddhists and (Vedic) Brahmans and only with time ceded by the former to the latter. In making this argument, I make use of a wide variety of early South Asian sources, including Brahmanical texts, inscriptions, and early Buddhist texts preserved in Pali, Sanskrit, Chinese, and Tibetan.

ISBN: 9781303052521Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122824
Religious history.

Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Brahmans: Negotiating Identities in Indian Antiquity.
LDR:03272nmm a2200313 4500 001 2076685
005 20161104141154.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303052521
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3559822
035 $a AAI3559822
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McGovern, Nathan Michael. $3 3192161
245 1 0 $a Buddhists, Brahmans, and Buddhist Brahmans: Negotiating Identities in Indian Antiquity.
300 $a 682 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Vesna A. Wallace.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a In this dissertation, I explore the way in which early Buddhists formed their own self-identity vis-a-vis Vedic Brahmans. Interestingly, while today we understand Buddhism and Hinduism as separate religions, and Brahmans as belonging to the latter religion, early Buddhist texts frequently refer to the Buddha, his enlightened disciples, or just the "ideal person" in the abstract as Brahmans. Many previous scholars have argued or assumed that the category "Brahman" was a term that belonged properly to the "Brahmanical tradition," whose roots long pre-date Buddhism, and thus concluded that early Buddhist uses of the word Brahman (brahman&dotbelow;a) should be interpreted as "borrowings" from the Brahmanical tradition, made for the purpose of polemic. I, however, argue that the word Brahman was a contested category that was not "owned" by a monolithic Brahmanical tradition and then borrowed by Buddhists to use polemically, but that it was a common honorific term that was actively contested by both Buddhists and (Vedic) Brahmans and only with time ceded by the former to the latter. In making this argument, I make use of a wide variety of early South Asian sources, including Brahmanical texts, inscriptions, and early Buddhist texts preserved in Pali, Sanskrit, Chinese, and Tibetan.
520 $a In the first part of my dissertation, I show that while there was a common vocabulary for describing religious practitioners in ancient India, Buddhist and Brahmanical texts deployed them differently in an effort to construct a unique and superior identity for their own respective ideals. Then, in the second part, I argue that the earliest Buddhist literature makes use of the word brahman&dotbelow;a ("Brahman") simply as an honorific for the ideal person, while later elaborations on this usage convert this simple honorific into a polemic against the Vedic Brahmans, who are depicted as unworthy of the name by which they call themselves. Finally, in the third part of my dissertation, I examine texts that I refer to as "encounter dialogs"---texts in which the Buddha encounters an interlocutor who is identified as a Brahman, and argue that through the implicit narrative structure of these texts, Buddhists effectively ceded the category "Brahman."
590 $a School code: 0035.
650 4 $a Religious history. $3 2122824
650 4 $a Asian history. $2 bicssc $3 1099323
650 4 $a Asian literature. $3 2122707
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0305
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Barbara. $b Religious Studies. $3 1033695
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-08A(E).
790 $a 0035
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3559822