東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

All Together Now: The Impact of Team...

Shand, Robert.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

All Together Now: The Impact of Team-Based Problem-Solving on Teacher Learning and Effectiveness.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	All Together Now: The Impact of Team-Based Problem-Solving on Teacher Learning and Effectiveness./
作者:	Shand, Robert.
面頁冊數:	238 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-06A(E).
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10003930
ISBN:	9781339429885

All Together Now: The Impact of Team-Based Problem-Solving on Teacher Learning and Effectiveness.
Shand, Robert.

All Together Now: The Impact of Team-Based Problem-Solving on Teacher Learning and Effectiveness. - 238 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

Schools face a great challenge in recruiting and retaining quality teachers, given the documented importance of, variability in, and difficulty observing and predicting teacher quality. One option schools have is to identify what more effective teachers do and use that information to train less effective teachers to get better. Unfortunately, there is little empirical support for much traditional teacher training, as measured by gains in student test scores. Models of collaborative, team-based learning---such as Professional Learning Communities and Japanese lesson study---have been widely touted, and there is some evidence that they may be effective in certain contexts. Economic theory suggests this could be because of peer monitoring, peer pressure, specialization, knowledge-sharing, or market failure in pre-service training, particularly if learning to teach is primarily experiential. However, not all collaboration is good due to concerns about free-riding and substituting for more productive individual activity, so unbridled enthusiasm for collaborative professional development may need to be tempered.

ISBN: 9781339429885Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.

All Together Now: The Impact of Team-Based Problem-Solving on Teacher Learning and Effectiveness.
LDR:04119nmm a2200301 4500 001 2076448
005 20161104135019.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339429885
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10003930
035 $a AAI10003930
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shand, Robert. $3 3191905
245 1 0 $a All Together Now: The Impact of Team-Based Problem-Solving on Teacher Learning and Effectiveness.
300 $a 238 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Judith E. Scott-Clayton.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a Schools face a great challenge in recruiting and retaining quality teachers, given the documented importance of, variability in, and difficulty observing and predicting teacher quality. One option schools have is to identify what more effective teachers do and use that information to train less effective teachers to get better. Unfortunately, there is little empirical support for much traditional teacher training, as measured by gains in student test scores. Models of collaborative, team-based learning---such as Professional Learning Communities and Japanese lesson study---have been widely touted, and there is some evidence that they may be effective in certain contexts. Economic theory suggests this could be because of peer monitoring, peer pressure, specialization, knowledge-sharing, or market failure in pre-service training, particularly if learning to teach is primarily experiential. However, not all collaboration is good due to concerns about free-riding and substituting for more productive individual activity, so unbridled enthusiasm for collaborative professional development may need to be tempered.
520 $a This dissertation examines the effectiveness of a specific form of teacher collaboration in the form of inquiry teams, groups of teachers and administrators jointly engaged in action research projects with the aim of uncovering innovative instructional strategies and sharing effective approaches. It takes advantage of the phase-in of teams, eventually to all teachers in a large, urban school district in the northeastern United States from 2007--2010 to estimate the results of three natural experiments using difference-in-differences and instrumental variables approaches. The effects of teamwork on teacher value-added, teacher retention, and student test scores are small and sensitive to year, specification, and outcome, although results are mostly positive and occasionally statistically significant, suggesting that overall effects are potentially positive but modest at best. Further examination of heterogeneity and four qualitative case studies of teams suggest that small average effects mask considerable differences in team processes, and that under certain conditions, inquiry team work may be far more effective. A cost analysis reveals that, although it is costly to do inquiry work well, given the low-intensity of average treatment and the large number of students affected, the benefits of inquiry work could exceed the costs if the policy were more targeted. Overall, the policy recommendation is to temper unqualified enthusiasm about teacher collaboration, as without appropriate structures and supports it has little measurable effect on the outcomes examined here. As a policy lever, a universal mandate to participate on collaborative inquiry teams is unlikely to be effective or pass a cost-benefit test. Nonetheless, smaller-scale, higher intensity forms of collaboration that allow for more active leadership support and participation may be more promising, and more cost-effective than alternative forms of professional development, particularly for some sub-groups of teachers such as those in their first year of teaching.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Labor economics. $3 642730
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0510
690 $a 0515
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b TC: Economics and Education. $3 1677420
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-06A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10003930