東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The five factor forgiveness inventor...

Glover, Natalie Gail.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The five factor forgiveness inventory: A measure of forgiveness from the perspective of the five factor model.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The five factor forgiveness inventory: A measure of forgiveness from the perspective of the five factor model./
作者:	Glover, Natalie Gail.
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03B(E).
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3731266
ISBN:	9781339176529

The five factor forgiveness inventory: A measure of forgiveness from the perspective of the five factor model.
Glover, Natalie Gail.

The five factor forgiveness inventory: A measure of forgiveness from the perspective of the five factor model. - 65 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kentucky, 2015.

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a five factor model (FFM) measure of forgiveness. Participants were 545 undergraduates currently enrolled in introductory and experimental psychology courses at the University of Kentucky (272 used for item construction, 273 for scale validation). Items were selected on the basis of convergent validity with five-factor model personality scales and forgiveness scales. Participants in the validation stage were administered the resulting Five Factor Forgiveness Inventory (FFFI), as well as the International Personality Item Pool-NEO (IPIP-NEO) and seven other existing forgiveness measures. Significant convergent validity was obtained for the vast majority of the seven FFFI subscales with their corresponding IPIP-NEO facet scales. Discriminant validity was good to excellent for all subscales, as well. FFFI subscales were all significantly correlated with the seven existing forgiveness measures, and the FFFI total score obtained significant incremental validity over all seven other forgiveness scales. Finally, multiple regression analyses revealed that FFFI scales accounted for additional variance in predicting results on existing forgiveness measures. The initial construction and validation of this measure provides a foundation for assessing forgiveness from the perspective of the FFM, thus providing a more comprehensive, nuanced understanding of the disposition to forgive.

ISBN: 9781339176529Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.

The five factor forgiveness inventory: A measure of forgiveness from the perspective of the five factor model.
LDR:02374nmm a2200289 4500 001 2076420
005 20161028121125.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339176529
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3731266
035 $a AAI3731266
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Glover, Natalie Gail. $3 3191874
245 1 4 $a The five factor forgiveness inventory: A measure of forgiveness from the perspective of the five factor model.
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Thomas A. Widiger.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kentucky, 2015.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a five factor model (FFM) measure of forgiveness. Participants were 545 undergraduates currently enrolled in introductory and experimental psychology courses at the University of Kentucky (272 used for item construction, 273 for scale validation). Items were selected on the basis of convergent validity with five-factor model personality scales and forgiveness scales. Participants in the validation stage were administered the resulting Five Factor Forgiveness Inventory (FFFI), as well as the International Personality Item Pool-NEO (IPIP-NEO) and seven other existing forgiveness measures. Significant convergent validity was obtained for the vast majority of the seven FFFI subscales with their corresponding IPIP-NEO facet scales. Discriminant validity was good to excellent for all subscales, as well. FFFI subscales were all significantly correlated with the seven existing forgiveness measures, and the FFFI total score obtained significant incremental validity over all seven other forgiveness scales. Finally, multiple regression analyses revealed that FFFI scales accounted for additional variance in predicting results on existing forgiveness measures. The initial construction and validation of this measure provides a foundation for assessing forgiveness from the perspective of the FFM, thus providing a more comprehensive, nuanced understanding of the disposition to forgive.
590 $a School code: 0102.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a University of Kentucky. $3 1017485
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03B(E).
790 $a 0102
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3731266