東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Public and private regulation - The ...

Oldfield, Michaela Wattenberg-Tarr.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Public and private regulation - The Food Safety Modernization Act and the governance of food safety in the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Public and private regulation - The Food Safety Modernization Act and the governance of food safety in the United States./
作者:	Oldfield, Michaela Wattenberg-Tarr.
面頁冊數:	143 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01A(E).
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3719825
ISBN:	9781339004648

Public and private regulation - The Food Safety Modernization Act and the governance of food safety in the United States.
Oldfield, Michaela Wattenberg-Tarr.

Public and private regulation - The Food Safety Modernization Act and the governance of food safety in the United States. - 143 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2015.

Using the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) as a case study, the dissertation examines evolving patterns of governance in the contemporary agrifood system. Scholars today note that governing is carried out through patterns of governance, in which rules are set, applied and enforced by all manner of social-political actors nested in overlapping networks at multiple scales and across diverse geographies. The research explores who is participating in these networks, how the actors and networks are interacting, and the consequences these overlapping networks have for different sectors of society to meaningfully affect the choices about their lives.

ISBN: 9781339004648Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.

Public and private regulation - The Food Safety Modernization Act and the governance of food safety in the United States.
LDR:02798nmm a2200301 4500 001 2075635
005 20161024135720.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339004648
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3719825
035 $a AAI3719825
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Oldfield, Michaela Wattenberg-Tarr. $3 3191035
245 1 0 $a Public and private regulation - The Food Safety Modernization Act and the governance of food safety in the United States.
300 $a 143 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michael W. Hamm.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2015.
520 $a Using the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) as a case study, the dissertation examines evolving patterns of governance in the contemporary agrifood system. Scholars today note that governing is carried out through patterns of governance, in which rules are set, applied and enforced by all manner of social-political actors nested in overlapping networks at multiple scales and across diverse geographies. The research explores who is participating in these networks, how the actors and networks are interacting, and the consequences these overlapping networks have for different sectors of society to meaningfully affect the choices about their lives.
520 $a The research examines how interactions among industry, public and private regulators, consumer groups and alternative agrifood activists in private and public-private regulatory networks shaped the policy choices in the FSMA and re-contoured the roles and relationships among public and private regulatory actors. The dynamics of proliferating policy networks are complicating the regulatory tasks of public regulators and undermining the capacity of some stakeholders to meaningfully participate in all of the relevant governance activities. In the enactment and rulemaking, alternative agrifood systems advocates sought to contest current agrifood governance patterns. They had some meaningful success establishing themselves as a distinct and legitimate interest group with potential political power. But ultimately governance continues to be dominated by corporate interests and neoliberal thinking. The conclusion is that emerging governance patterns are undermining traditional democratic normative values. Attempting to dramatically restructure the system seems untenable, while staying the course and perhaps re-conceptualizing normative values of governance is dissatisfying.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Agricultural economics. $3 3172150
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Community Sustainability-Doctor of Philosophy. $3 3174953
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01A(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3719825