東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Development of a rubric for collegia...

Moore, Kendall Ryan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Development of a rubric for collegiate jazz improvisation performance assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Development of a rubric for collegiate jazz improvisation performance assessment./
作者:	Moore, Kendall Ryan.
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-10A(E).
標題:	Music. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10110361
ISBN:	9781339736174

Development of a rubric for collegiate jazz improvisation performance assessment.
Moore, Kendall Ryan.

Development of a rubric for collegiate jazz improvisation performance assessment. - 65 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.M.A.)--University of Miami, 2016.

The purpose of this study was to develop a jazz improvisation rubric for the evaluation of collegiate jazz improvisation. To create this measure, research objectives were devised to investigate the aurally- observed performer-controlled components of improvisation, which aurally-observed components should be evaluated in an improvisatory performance, and whether a comprehensive measure could be developed to evaluate such a performance. Published methods on general music performance, jazz improvisation performance methods, jazz pedagogy texts, and statements from jazz educators and performers were content analyzed and cross referenced to determine overarching similarities and create criteria for evaluation. After conducting research, it was determined that the five most frequent component measurement terms used were rhythm, technical facility, tone, articulation, and melodic/rhythmic development. Those components were categorized into the following concepts: Technique/Technical Facility, Expression, Tone/Tone Control, Rhythm, Melody/Motives, Interaction, Harmony, and overall improvisation. A rubric was created using these concepts and included the following dimensions: technique, expression, rhythm, melody, harmony, rhythmic interaction, melodic interaction, harmonic interaction, and overall improvisation. The quality of each dimension was devised from lowest quality to highest quality: does not meet expectations, below expectations, meets expectations, and exceeds expectations. Suggestions for implementation of the rubric in the collegiate setting were suggested, along with areas for further research to determine the reliability of the rubric.

ISBN: 9781339736174Subjects--Topical Terms:

516178
Music.

Development of a rubric for collegiate jazz improvisation performance assessment.
LDR:02590nmm a2200289 4500 001 2075435
005 20161110122244.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339736174
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10110361
035 $a AAI10110361
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moore, Kendall Ryan. $3 3190820
245 1 0 $a Development of a rubric for collegiate jazz improvisation performance assessment.
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Kathryn I. Reid; Brian E. Russell.
502 $a Thesis (D.M.A.)--University of Miami, 2016.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to develop a jazz improvisation rubric for the evaluation of collegiate jazz improvisation. To create this measure, research objectives were devised to investigate the aurally- observed performer-controlled components of improvisation, which aurally-observed components should be evaluated in an improvisatory performance, and whether a comprehensive measure could be developed to evaluate such a performance. Published methods on general music performance, jazz improvisation performance methods, jazz pedagogy texts, and statements from jazz educators and performers were content analyzed and cross referenced to determine overarching similarities and create criteria for evaluation. After conducting research, it was determined that the five most frequent component measurement terms used were rhythm, technical facility, tone, articulation, and melodic/rhythmic development. Those components were categorized into the following concepts: Technique/Technical Facility, Expression, Tone/Tone Control, Rhythm, Melody/Motives, Interaction, Harmony, and overall improvisation. A rubric was created using these concepts and included the following dimensions: technique, expression, rhythm, melody, harmony, rhythmic interaction, melodic interaction, harmonic interaction, and overall improvisation. The quality of each dimension was devised from lowest quality to highest quality: does not meet expectations, below expectations, meets expectations, and exceeds expectations. Suggestions for implementation of the rubric in the collegiate setting were suggested, along with areas for further research to determine the reliability of the rubric.
590 $a School code: 0125.
650 4 $a Music. $3 516178
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Music education. $3 3168367
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0522
710 2 $a University of Miami. $b Studio Jazz Writing (Music). $3 3190821
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-10A(E).
790 $a 0125
791 $a D.M.A.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10110361