東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Reliability generalizations of the A...

King, Chelsi.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reliability generalizations of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Racial Identity Attitudes Scales.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reliability generalizations of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Racial Identity Attitudes Scales./
作者:	King, Chelsi.
面頁冊數:	158 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03B(E).
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3731100
ISBN:	9781339174426

Reliability generalizations of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Racial Identity Attitudes Scales.
King, Chelsi.

Reliability generalizations of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Racial Identity Attitudes Scales. - 158 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Alliant International University, 2016.

The statistical technique, reliability generalization (RG), was employed to analyze and synthesize reliability coefficients from previous studies using the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS) and Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (RIAS), which also included the Black Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (BRIAS), People of Color Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (PRIAS), and White Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (WRIAS). The purpose of this research was to investigate both measurement and sample characteristics that impact reliability coefficients across studies and sample populations, for better or worse. Cronbach's alpha, a specific type of reliability, was assessed in the current research. In the AWS-RG study, publication year and number of items were significant predictors of reliability and accounted for 26% of the total variance in reliability scores. The results indicate that reliability has deceased for the AWS over time, likely the result of item wording when the scale was written in contrast to spoken language, today. In the RIAS and related scales RG study, our results suggested that individuals who identified as Black produced significantly lower reliability scores than did individuals of other races on the Immersion/Emersion subscale. Additionally, examinees enrolled in undergraduate programs produced higher reliability scores than did those enrolled in or who had previously completed graduate school on the Pre-encounter/Conformity subscale. Overall, RIAS, BRIAS, PRIAS, and WRIAS produced scores with poor internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, in which future researchers may consider calculating reliability for the RIAS, BRIAS, PRIAS, and WRIAS using a different form of reliability. Findings from these studies can help assist researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate instruments better suited for their population.

ISBN: 9781339174426Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.

Reliability generalizations of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Racial Identity Attitudes Scales.
LDR:02810nmm a2200289 4500 001 2075327
005 20161024150954.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339174426
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3731100
035 $a AAI3731100
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a King, Chelsi. $3 3190710
245 1 0 $a Reliability generalizations of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Racial Identity Attitudes Scales.
300 $a 158 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Siobhan K. O'Toole.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Alliant International University, 2016.
520 $a The statistical technique, reliability generalization (RG), was employed to analyze and synthesize reliability coefficients from previous studies using the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS) and Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (RIAS), which also included the Black Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (BRIAS), People of Color Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (PRIAS), and White Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (WRIAS). The purpose of this research was to investigate both measurement and sample characteristics that impact reliability coefficients across studies and sample populations, for better or worse. Cronbach's alpha, a specific type of reliability, was assessed in the current research. In the AWS-RG study, publication year and number of items were significant predictors of reliability and accounted for 26% of the total variance in reliability scores. The results indicate that reliability has deceased for the AWS over time, likely the result of item wording when the scale was written in contrast to spoken language, today. In the RIAS and related scales RG study, our results suggested that individuals who identified as Black produced significantly lower reliability scores than did individuals of other races on the Immersion/Emersion subscale. Additionally, examinees enrolled in undergraduate programs produced higher reliability scores than did those enrolled in or who had previously completed graduate school on the Pre-encounter/Conformity subscale. Overall, RIAS, BRIAS, PRIAS, and WRIAS produced scores with poor internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, in which future researchers may consider calculating reliability for the RIAS, BRIAS, PRIAS, and WRIAS using a different form of reliability. Findings from these studies can help assist researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate instruments better suited for their population.
590 $a School code: 1634.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0463
710 2 $a Alliant International University. $b Fresno, CSPP. $3 2100441
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03B(E).
790 $a 1634
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3731100