東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Pilot study: Effect of a worksite we...

Sandon, Lona F.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Pilot study: Effect of a worksite weight-loss intervention and social influence on self-efficacy and self-regulation for eating and exercise.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Pilot study: Effect of a worksite weight-loss intervention and social influence on self-efficacy and self-regulation for eating and exercise./
作者:	Sandon, Lona F.
面頁冊數:	181 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-10A(E).
標題:	Health education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10131693
ISBN:	9781339894645

Pilot study: Effect of a worksite weight-loss intervention and social influence on self-efficacy and self-regulation for eating and exercise.
Sandon, Lona F.

Pilot study: Effect of a worksite weight-loss intervention and social influence on self-efficacy and self-regulation for eating and exercise. - 181 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas Woman's University, 2016.

Employers need more effective workplace interventions to address overweight and obesity. Self-efficacy (SE) and self-regulation (SR) of weight management behaviors and social influence are important factors for weight loss. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to assess the influence of an intervention on SR, SE, and weight at a worksite and investigate the effect of social influence on these variables. Female employees (age M = 46.5) with a BMI greater than 25 consented and enrolled in the 10-week intervention ( n = 58) or control (n = 38) group. Intervention (n = 41) and control (n = 32) participants completed the WEL-SF, PAAI, SR-Eat, and SR-PA questionnaires and weight measurements at week-1, 10, and 14. A sub-set of intervention participants (n = 11) completed interviews during week-11 and 12. Using mixed ANOVA, only WEL-SF scores were significant for between-subjects effects (p < .01). Time and time-by-group effect were significant for weight and BMI (p = .01, p = .00), SE-Eat, SR-Eat ( p = .00), SE-PA (p = .00, p = .02 respectively), and SR-PA (p = .00, p = .04 respectively). Independent t-tests were significant for SE-Eat and SR-Eat at week-10 (p ≤ .01). Intervention group paired t-tests were significant for increased SE-Eat, SR-Eat, SE-PA, SR-PA, fruit intake, strength/stretching, and aerobic exercise (p ≤ .01), and decreased weight and BMI (p ≤ .01) at week-10 and 14. Attendance correlated with weight loss, SR-Eat, and aerobic exercise (p ≤ .05). Change in SR-Eat was correlated with change in weight at week-10 (r = -.43, p = .01) compared to change in SE-Eat and weight (r = -.35, p = .02). Interviewees perceived limited social influence of co-workers. Social influence on SE and SR included themes of support, role modeling, competition, accountability, and motivation. Behavioral-based worksite weight-loss interventions can influence SE, SR, lead to weight loss, and changes in eating and exercise behaviors. Attendance is a factor for SR and weight loss outcomes. SR for eating behavior was stronger than SE for weight loss outcomes. Social influence played a small role, but interviewees did not perceive it as a strong influence.

ISBN: 9781339894645Subjects--Topical Terms:

559086
Health education.

Pilot study: Effect of a worksite weight-loss intervention and social influence on self-efficacy and self-regulation for eating and exercise.
LDR:03213nmm a2200301 4500 001 2075075
005 20161014133726.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339894645
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10131693
035 $a AAI10131693
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sandon, Lona F. $3 3190448
245 1 0 $a Pilot study: Effect of a worksite weight-loss intervention and social influence on self-efficacy and self-regulation for eating and exercise.
300 $a 181 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Katie Crosslin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas Woman's University, 2016.
520 $a Employers need more effective workplace interventions to address overweight and obesity. Self-efficacy (SE) and self-regulation (SR) of weight management behaviors and social influence are important factors for weight loss. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to assess the influence of an intervention on SR, SE, and weight at a worksite and investigate the effect of social influence on these variables. Female employees (age M = 46.5) with a BMI greater than 25 consented and enrolled in the 10-week intervention ( n = 58) or control (n = 38) group. Intervention (n = 41) and control (n = 32) participants completed the WEL-SF, PAAI, SR-Eat, and SR-PA questionnaires and weight measurements at week-1, 10, and 14. A sub-set of intervention participants (n = 11) completed interviews during week-11 and 12. Using mixed ANOVA, only WEL-SF scores were significant for between-subjects effects (p < .01). Time and time-by-group effect were significant for weight and BMI (p = .01, p = .00), SE-Eat, SR-Eat ( p = .00), SE-PA (p = .00, p = .02 respectively), and SR-PA (p = .00, p = .04 respectively). Independent t-tests were significant for SE-Eat and SR-Eat at week-10 (p ≤ .01). Intervention group paired t-tests were significant for increased SE-Eat, SR-Eat, SE-PA, SR-PA, fruit intake, strength/stretching, and aerobic exercise (p ≤ .01), and decreased weight and BMI (p ≤ .01) at week-10 and 14. Attendance correlated with weight loss, SR-Eat, and aerobic exercise (p ≤ .05). Change in SR-Eat was correlated with change in weight at week-10 (r = -.43, p = .01) compared to change in SE-Eat and weight (r = -.35, p = .02). Interviewees perceived limited social influence of co-workers. Social influence on SE and SR included themes of support, role modeling, competition, accountability, and motivation. Behavioral-based worksite weight-loss interventions can influence SE, SR, lead to weight loss, and changes in eating and exercise behaviors. Attendance is a factor for SR and weight loss outcomes. SR for eating behavior was stronger than SE for weight loss outcomes. Social influence played a small role, but interviewees did not perceive it as a strong influence.
590 $a School code: 0925.
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Nutrition. $3 517777
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0570
710 2 $a Texas Woman's University. $b Health Studies. $3 3190449
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-10A(E).
790 $a 0925
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10131693