東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Identifying gifted minorities using ...

Edmonds, Melissa M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Identifying gifted minorities using nonverbal tests:The Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7, versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, second edition.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Identifying gifted minorities using nonverbal tests:The Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7, versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, second edition./
作者:	Edmonds, Melissa M.
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
標題:	Gifted education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3730349
ISBN:	9781339166070

Identifying gifted minorities using nonverbal tests:The Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7, versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, second edition.
Edmonds, Melissa M.

Identifying gifted minorities using nonverbal tests:The Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7, versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, second edition. - 92 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Regent University, 2015.

Recent research in the area of gifted education has focused on developing alternate strategies for identification in order to increase the diversity of students identified for gifted services. Many alternate identification strategies rely on group-administered, nonverbal reasoning tests. Two of the most commonly administered group tests are the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). The purpose of this study was to compare the nonverbal scores of the most recent editions of each test in terms of gender, cultural, socioeconomic, and linguistic sensitivity for gifted student identification. The study compared the test performance of 12,670 third-grade students in one school division who took both tests as part of a division-wide screening for gifted identification. No significant differences were found between the two tests in terms of the similarity of nonverbal mean scores and variances among subgroups, and neither test had an advantage in providing minority representation at hypothetical gifted program cut scores. The CogAT Form 7 (CogAT7) nonverbal subtest was a better predictor of student success on the Virginia third-grade end-of-course tests in math and reading than the NNAT second edition (NNAT-2). The results of this study suggest that divisions should not assume that the NNAT-2, a nonverbal figural reasoning test, has an advantage over the CogAT7 in terms of identifying minority students for gifted evaluation.

ISBN: 9781339166070Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172499
Gifted education.

Identifying gifted minorities using nonverbal tests:The Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7, versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, second edition.
LDR:02440nmm a2200289 4500 001 2074943
005 20161008135103.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339166070
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3730349
035 $a AAI3730349
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Edmonds, Melissa M. $3 3190302
245 1 0 $a Identifying gifted minorities using nonverbal tests:The Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7, versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, second edition.
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Glenn Koonce.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Regent University, 2015.
520 $a Recent research in the area of gifted education has focused on developing alternate strategies for identification in order to increase the diversity of students identified for gifted services. Many alternate identification strategies rely on group-administered, nonverbal reasoning tests. Two of the most commonly administered group tests are the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). The purpose of this study was to compare the nonverbal scores of the most recent editions of each test in terms of gender, cultural, socioeconomic, and linguistic sensitivity for gifted student identification. The study compared the test performance of 12,670 third-grade students in one school division who took both tests as part of a division-wide screening for gifted identification. No significant differences were found between the two tests in terms of the similarity of nonverbal mean scores and variances among subgroups, and neither test had an advantage in providing minority representation at hypothetical gifted program cut scores. The CogAT Form 7 (CogAT7) nonverbal subtest was a better predictor of student success on the Virginia third-grade end-of-course tests in math and reading than the NNAT second edition (NNAT-2). The results of this study suggest that divisions should not assume that the NNAT-2, a nonverbal figural reasoning test, has an advantage over the CogAT7 in terms of identifying minority students for gifted evaluation.
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a Gifted education. $3 3172499
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
690 $a 0445
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0515
710 2 $a Regent University. $b School of Education. $3 3169899
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 1058
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3730349