東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Students' perspectives on the impact...

Wilson, Chastity L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Students' perspectives on the impact universally designed assessments have on mathematics achievement.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Students' perspectives on the impact universally designed assessments have on mathematics achievement./
作者:	Wilson, Chastity L.
面頁冊數:	260 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3729375
ISBN:	9781339151861

Students' perspectives on the impact universally designed assessments have on mathematics achievement.
Wilson, Chastity L.

Students' perspectives on the impact universally designed assessments have on mathematics achievement. - 260 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2015.

This dissertation study examined the perspectives of eight grade students with mild disabilities to determine the impact a universally designed computer-based assessment had on their ability to demonstrate mastery of a mathematical concept. The research participants (seven eighth grade students classified as having a mild intellectual disability or learning disability) were administered two forms of a mathematics assessment, a universally designed computer-based test and a paper-based test. Qualitative methodology was utilized to investigate the experiences these participants incurred while taking the two types of test. Data were gathered through document analyses, observations, in-depth interviews, and a focus group interview. Methods triangulation was employed to analyze the viewpoints of the participants gathered through these procedures. Research outcomes revealed that most of the participants (N = 5) demonstrated higher achievement on the paper-based mathematics assessment. Though several students (N = 4) perceived the universally designed computer-based mathematics test to be more accessible than the paper-based mathematics test, five of the seven participants made fewer errors on the paper-based assessment. These findings indicated that students' perceptions of an evaluation instrument do not necessarily impact the assessment outcomes.

ISBN: 9781339151861Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.

Students' perspectives on the impact universally designed assessments have on mathematics achievement.
LDR:02329nmm a2200289 4500 001 2074941
005 20161008135103.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339151861
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3729375
035 $a AAI3729375
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wilson, Chastity L. $3 3190299
245 1 0 $a Students' perspectives on the impact universally designed assessments have on mathematics achievement.
300 $a 260 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: James A. Taylor.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2015.
520 $a This dissertation study examined the perspectives of eight grade students with mild disabilities to determine the impact a universally designed computer-based assessment had on their ability to demonstrate mastery of a mathematical concept. The research participants (seven eighth grade students classified as having a mild intellectual disability or learning disability) were administered two forms of a mathematics assessment, a universally designed computer-based test and a paper-based test. Qualitative methodology was utilized to investigate the experiences these participants incurred while taking the two types of test. Data were gathered through document analyses, observations, in-depth interviews, and a focus group interview. Methods triangulation was employed to analyze the viewpoints of the participants gathered through these procedures. Research outcomes revealed that most of the participants (N = 5) demonstrated higher achievement on the paper-based mathematics assessment. Though several students (N = 4) perceived the universally designed computer-based mathematics test to be more accessible than the paper-based mathematics test, five of the seven participants made fewer errors on the paper-based assessment. These findings indicated that students' perceptions of an evaluation instrument do not necessarily impact the assessment outcomes.
590 $a School code: 1218.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0280
710 2 $a Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 3190300
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 1218
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3729375