東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and L...

Jankovic, Roza.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and Links to Outcomes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and Links to Outcomes./
作者:	Jankovic, Roza.
面頁冊數:	172 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-04A(E).
標題:	Organizational behavior. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3737206
ISBN:	9781339264424

Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and Links to Outcomes.
Jankovic, Roza.

Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and Links to Outcomes. - 172 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Hofstra University, 2015.

Team research has gained popularity due to increasing task complexity, globalization, and technology advances, all of which cause many to work together across time and location boundaries. There has been research comparing measurement methods for team processes of cognitions and attitudes, but little on team behaviors. In a series of pilot studies, a team task and behaviors were selected, and a rating scale was developed for external raters. Raters were trained to rate seven team behaviors (mutual performance monitoring, mission analysis, conflict resolution/management, motivation of others, intrateam feedback, task-related assertiveness, and planning) with it. One set of raters rated the team holistically, and the other rated individual team members. ICCs for both sets of raters were low. Team ratings were conducted in three ways: holistic team ratings, averaged individual ratings, and variance of individual ratings. Factor analysis results differed across the three methods despite various rotations. It was hypothesized that holistic and averaged individual ratings would correlate positively with solution correctness but negatively with task time. There was mixed support for these hypotheses. Holistic intrateam feedback ratings correlated positively with task correctness and task time. For averaged individual ratings, conflict resolution management correlated negatively with Solution correctness. Mutual performance monitoring, motivation of others, intrateam feedback, and task-related assertiveness correlated positively with task time. With variance of individual ratings, conflict resolution management correlated negatively with solution correctness, and motivation of others correlated positively with time. Regression analysis showed only averaged individual ratings predicted task time. All other models were not significant.

ISBN: 9781339264424Subjects--Topical Terms:

516683
Organizational behavior.

Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and Links to Outcomes.
LDR:02723nmm a2200289 4500 001 2073759
005 20160926135152.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339264424
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3737206
035 $a AAI3737206
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jankovic, Roza. $3 3189036
245 1 0 $a Teamwork Behavior: Measurement and Links to Outcomes.
300 $a 172 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: William Metlay.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Hofstra University, 2015.
520 $a Team research has gained popularity due to increasing task complexity, globalization, and technology advances, all of which cause many to work together across time and location boundaries. There has been research comparing measurement methods for team processes of cognitions and attitudes, but little on team behaviors. In a series of pilot studies, a team task and behaviors were selected, and a rating scale was developed for external raters. Raters were trained to rate seven team behaviors (mutual performance monitoring, mission analysis, conflict resolution/management, motivation of others, intrateam feedback, task-related assertiveness, and planning) with it. One set of raters rated the team holistically, and the other rated individual team members. ICCs for both sets of raters were low. Team ratings were conducted in three ways: holistic team ratings, averaged individual ratings, and variance of individual ratings. Factor analysis results differed across the three methods despite various rotations. It was hypothesized that holistic and averaged individual ratings would correlate positively with solution correctness but negatively with task time. There was mixed support for these hypotheses. Holistic intrateam feedback ratings correlated positively with task correctness and task time. For averaged individual ratings, conflict resolution management correlated negatively with Solution correctness. Mutual performance monitoring, motivation of others, intrateam feedback, and task-related assertiveness correlated positively with task time. With variance of individual ratings, conflict resolution management correlated negatively with solution correctness, and motivation of others correlated positively with time. Regression analysis showed only averaged individual ratings predicted task time. All other models were not significant.
590 $a School code: 0086.
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0624
710 2 $a Hofstra University. $b Applied Organizational Psychology. $3 1684927
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-04A(E).
790 $a 0086
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3737206