語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Gov...
~
Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly Ruggles.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Governance.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Governance./
作者:
Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly Ruggles.
面頁冊數:
243 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International75-12A(E).
標題:
Environmental justice. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3631446
ISBN:
9781321100433
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Governance.
Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly Ruggles.
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Governance.
- 243 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-12(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2014.
This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Claims of injustice in global forest governance are prolific: assertions of colonization, marginalization and disenfranchisement of forest-dependent people, and privatization of common resources are some of the most severe allegations of injustice resulting from globally-driven forest conservation initiatives. At its core, the debate over the future of the world's forests is fraught with ethical concerns. Policy makers are not only deciding how forests should be governed, but also who will be winners, losers, and who should have a voice in the decision-making processes. For 30 years, policy makers have sought to redress the concerns of the world's 1.6 billion forest-dependent poor by introducing rights-based and participatory approaches to conservation. Despite these efforts, however, claims of injustice persist.
ISBN: 9781321100433Subjects--Topical Terms:
528369
Environmental justice.
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Governance.
LDR
:02561nmm a2200337 4500
001
2073486
005
20160915132547.5
008
170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321100433
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3631446
035
$a
AAI3631446
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly Ruggles.
$3
3188742
245
1 4
$a
The Justice Gap in Global Forest Governance.
300
$a
243 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-12(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Advisers: Erika S. Weinthal; Lisa M. Campbell.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2014.
506
$a
This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520
$a
Claims of injustice in global forest governance are prolific: assertions of colonization, marginalization and disenfranchisement of forest-dependent people, and privatization of common resources are some of the most severe allegations of injustice resulting from globally-driven forest conservation initiatives. At its core, the debate over the future of the world's forests is fraught with ethical concerns. Policy makers are not only deciding how forests should be governed, but also who will be winners, losers, and who should have a voice in the decision-making processes. For 30 years, policy makers have sought to redress the concerns of the world's 1.6 billion forest-dependent poor by introducing rights-based and participatory approaches to conservation. Despite these efforts, however, claims of injustice persist.
520
$a
This research examines possible explanations for continued claims of injustice by asking: What are the barriers to delivering justice to forest-dependent communities? Using data collected through surveys, interviews, and collaborative event ethnography in Laos and at the Tenth Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, this dissertation examines the pursuit of justice in global forest governance across multiple scales of governance. The findings reveal that particular conceptualizations of justice have become a central part of the metanormative fabric of global environmental governance, inhibiting institutional evolution and therewith perpetuating the justice gap in global forest governance.
590
$a
School code: 0066.
650
4
$a
Environmental justice.
$3
528369
650
4
$a
Environmental studies.
$3
2122803
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
Environmental management.
$3
535182
650
4
$a
Conservation biology.
$3
535736
690
$a
0619
690
$a
0477
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0474
690
$a
0408
710
2
$a
Duke University.
$b
Environment.
$3
1018684
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
75-12A(E).
790
$a
0066
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2014
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3631446
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9306354
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入