東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Is the God of Christian theology apa...

Gilmore, Kenneth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Is the God of Christian theology apathetic?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Is the God of Christian theology apathetic?/
作者:	Gilmore, Kenneth.
面頁冊數:	32 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-05(E).
標題:	Philosophy of Religion. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1591243
ISBN:	9781321823387

Is the God of Christian theology apathetic?
Gilmore, Kenneth.

Is the God of Christian theology apathetic? - 32 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2015.

The argument of my thesis is that the God of Christian theology has adopted the doctrine of impassibility from Plato and Aristotle. According to this doctrine, God does not experience a variety of psychological states such as anger, sorrow, joy, and love. I will argue that the doctrine of impassibility is not only incongruent with the God of Scripture who is dynamic, redemptive, and loving toward his creation, but that it is antithetical to other core fundamental doctrines in Scripture.

ISBN: 9781321823387Subjects--Topical Terms:

896987
Philosophy of Religion.

Is the God of Christian theology apathetic?
LDR:02386nmm a2200301 4500 001 2073255
005 20160915132412.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321823387
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1591243
035 $a AAI1591243
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gilmore, Kenneth. $3 3188491
245 1 0 $a Is the God of Christian theology apathetic?
300 $a 32 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
500 $a Adviser: Steven Skultety.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2015.
520 $a The argument of my thesis is that the God of Christian theology has adopted the doctrine of impassibility from Plato and Aristotle. According to this doctrine, God does not experience a variety of psychological states such as anger, sorrow, joy, and love. I will argue that the doctrine of impassibility is not only incongruent with the God of Scripture who is dynamic, redemptive, and loving toward his creation, but that it is antithetical to other core fundamental doctrines in Scripture.
520 $a I begin by giving an overview of the debate in Part I by surveying the three views on passibility and impassibility in the schools of Thomistic, Reformed, and Open Theism. In Part II, I give the negative case against God's impassibility by looking at key texts in Scripture that are thought to give support to impassibility. In this section, I also criticize arguments commonly made for impassibility. First, I critically examine a notion of transcendence that is often used to defend impassibility and show how this notion would completely ignore scriptural evidence that God possesses different psychological states in his dialogue with humans. Second, in Part II, I respond to the argument that passibility puts God's sovereignty at risk and argue that a God who desires good for his creation is not problematic. In Part III, I lay out the positive case for why I think God is passible. My defense rests upon the idea of God's divine freedom, the doctrine of the imago Dei, and the concept that God is capable of redeeming his creation.
590 $a School code: 0131.
650 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 896987
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0469
710 2 $a The University of Mississippi. $b Philosophy. $3 3188492
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-05(E).
790 $a 0131
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1591243