東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Associations Between Provider Type, ...

Espinoza, Reginaldo Chase.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Associations Between Provider Type, Setting of Practice, Experience with Co-occurring Populations, and Treatment Preferences for Co-occurring Disorders.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Associations Between Provider Type, Setting of Practice, Experience with Co-occurring Populations, and Treatment Preferences for Co-occurring Disorders./
作者:	Espinoza, Reginaldo Chase.
面頁冊數:	180 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-12B(E).
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3719122
ISBN:	9781321993806

Associations Between Provider Type, Setting of Practice, Experience with Co-occurring Populations, and Treatment Preferences for Co-occurring Disorders.
Espinoza, Reginaldo Chase.

Associations Between Provider Type, Setting of Practice, Experience with Co-occurring Populations, and Treatment Preferences for Co-occurring Disorders. - 180 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2016.

Individuals with co-occurring disorders are often met with treatment disparities, poor continuity of care, and lack of multidisciplinary treatment. Despite increased research on the subject of co-occurring disorders, studies regarding clinicians' perceptions of co-occurring disorders remain limited. The goal of this study was to ascertain effects of provider type, amount of experience with co-occurring populations, and setting of practice on higher-order treatment preferences for co-occurring disorders. Data was collected using the investigator's instrument, the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Preferences Survey (CDTPS), which was factor analyzed and tested for reliability prior to hypothesis testing. Approximately 6,500 recruitment requests were deployed to mental and behavioral health practitioners across the United States, with a survey completion rate of approximately 5.45% (N=354). The sample included in analyses (N=318) included drug and alcohol counselors, psychiatrists, master's level clinicians, and psychologists. Approximately 33% of participants reported operating in private practices, 30% in non-hospital facilities, 23% in hospital facilities, and 15% in a combination thereof. Almost 70% of participants endorsed having 10 years or more experience with co-occurring populations. Mean and modal distributions reflected high overall prevalence of integrated treatment endorsement, precontemporary substance abuse philosophy, and eclecticism among all provider types and settings. Approximately 99% of subjects endorsed integrated treatment as their primary preference. Psychiatric treatment was endorsed with greater variance than were substance abuse-focused and integrated treatments, respectively. Discriminant function analyses revealed that treatment preferences, as measured by CDTPS subscales, significantly predicted provider type and setting of practice (p<.01). Multiple regressions revealed that some provider types significantly predicted strength of psychiatric, substance abuse-focused, and integrated treatment endorsement (p<.05). Some settings of practice significantly predicted strength of integrated treatment endorsement (p<.05). Findings indicate important differences in treatment preferences between clinicians in distinct disciplines and settings of practice. Findings also denote progress in the dissemination and advancement of integrated treatment for co-occurring conditions. This study highlights a need for increased educational and training focus on multidisciplinary roles, limitations of scope, complementary service continuity, and meaning and protocols of integrated approaches to substance use comorbidity.

ISBN: 9781321993806Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.

Associations Between Provider Type, Setting of Practice, Experience with Co-occurring Populations, and Treatment Preferences for Co-occurring Disorders.
LDR:03663nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072453
005 20160808080358.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321993806
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3719122
035 $a AAI3719122
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Espinoza, Reginaldo Chase. $3 3187634
245 1 0 $a Associations Between Provider Type, Setting of Practice, Experience with Co-occurring Populations, and Treatment Preferences for Co-occurring Disorders.
300 $a 180 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Dean Rishel.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2016.
520 $a Individuals with co-occurring disorders are often met with treatment disparities, poor continuity of care, and lack of multidisciplinary treatment. Despite increased research on the subject of co-occurring disorders, studies regarding clinicians' perceptions of co-occurring disorders remain limited. The goal of this study was to ascertain effects of provider type, amount of experience with co-occurring populations, and setting of practice on higher-order treatment preferences for co-occurring disorders. Data was collected using the investigator's instrument, the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Preferences Survey (CDTPS), which was factor analyzed and tested for reliability prior to hypothesis testing. Approximately 6,500 recruitment requests were deployed to mental and behavioral health practitioners across the United States, with a survey completion rate of approximately 5.45% (N=354). The sample included in analyses (N=318) included drug and alcohol counselors, psychiatrists, master's level clinicians, and psychologists. Approximately 33% of participants reported operating in private practices, 30% in non-hospital facilities, 23% in hospital facilities, and 15% in a combination thereof. Almost 70% of participants endorsed having 10 years or more experience with co-occurring populations. Mean and modal distributions reflected high overall prevalence of integrated treatment endorsement, precontemporary substance abuse philosophy, and eclecticism among all provider types and settings. Approximately 99% of subjects endorsed integrated treatment as their primary preference. Psychiatric treatment was endorsed with greater variance than were substance abuse-focused and integrated treatments, respectively. Discriminant function analyses revealed that treatment preferences, as measured by CDTPS subscales, significantly predicted provider type and setting of practice (p<.01). Multiple regressions revealed that some provider types significantly predicted strength of psychiatric, substance abuse-focused, and integrated treatment endorsement (p<.05). Some settings of practice significantly predicted strength of integrated treatment endorsement (p<.05). Findings indicate important differences in treatment preferences between clinicians in distinct disciplines and settings of practice. Findings also denote progress in the dissemination and advancement of integrated treatment for co-occurring conditions. This study highlights a need for increased educational and training focus on multidisciplinary roles, limitations of scope, complementary service continuity, and meaning and protocols of integrated approaches to substance use comorbidity.
590 $a School code: 0971.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Counseling Psychology. $3 2122842
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. $b Clinical Forensic Psychology. $3 3169705
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-12B(E).
790 $a 0971
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3719122