東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Forest Management Divide: Eviden...

Anderson, Eric A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Forest Management Divide: Evidence From Administrative Comments on U.S. Forest Service Projects Indicating Why Environmental Interest Groups in the Northwestern U.S. Choose Whether or Not to Collaborate.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Forest Management Divide: Evidence From Administrative Comments on U.S. Forest Service Projects Indicating Why Environmental Interest Groups in the Northwestern U.S. Choose Whether or Not to Collaborate./
作者:	Anderson, Eric A.
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-05(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1591647
ISBN:	9781321834673

The Forest Management Divide: Evidence From Administrative Comments on U.S. Forest Service Projects Indicating Why Environmental Interest Groups in the Northwestern U.S. Choose Whether or Not to Collaborate.
Anderson, Eric A.

The Forest Management Divide: Evidence From Administrative Comments on U.S. Forest Service Projects Indicating Why Environmental Interest Groups in the Northwestern U.S. Choose Whether or Not to Collaborate. - 165 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Idaho, 2015.

This thesis combines current research on grassroots environmental interest groups attitudes and behaviors toward collaboration, with (Theory XYZ about EIG motivations) to better understand factors determining the groups' decision to litigate or collaborate on U.S. Forest Service vegetation management projects authorized under the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP). This study departs from previous research by analyzing documentary evidence generated by the interest groups in the form of the administrative comments made on CFLRP sponsored projects as part of the National Environmental Policy Act's (NEPA) notice and comment requirements to gain judicial standing to sue. Results indicate that the attitudes and behaviors of grassroots environmental groups toward collaboration are heavily influenced by trust in both the impetus to manage the forest at all, and the stakeholders doing the managing.

ISBN: 9781321834673Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

The Forest Management Divide: Evidence From Administrative Comments on U.S. Forest Service Projects Indicating Why Environmental Interest Groups in the Northwestern U.S. Choose Whether or Not to Collaborate.
LDR:01920nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072355
005 20160808080334.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321834673
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1591647
035 $a AAI1591647
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Anderson, Eric A. $3 3187526
245 1 4 $a The Forest Management Divide: Evidence From Administrative Comments on U.S. Forest Service Projects Indicating Why Environmental Interest Groups in the Northwestern U.S. Choose Whether or Not to Collaborate.
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
500 $a Adviser: Patrick Wilson.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Idaho, 2015.
520 $a This thesis combines current research on grassroots environmental interest groups attitudes and behaviors toward collaboration, with (Theory XYZ about EIG motivations) to better understand factors determining the groups' decision to litigate or collaborate on U.S. Forest Service vegetation management projects authorized under the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP). This study departs from previous research by analyzing documentary evidence generated by the interest groups in the form of the administrative comments made on CFLRP sponsored projects as part of the National Environmental Policy Act's (NEPA) notice and comment requirements to gain judicial standing to sue. Results indicate that the attitudes and behaviors of grassroots environmental groups toward collaboration are heavily influenced by trust in both the impetus to manage the forest at all, and the stakeholders doing the managing.
590 $a School code: 0089.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Environmental management. $3 535182
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a University of Idaho. $b Bioregional Planning. $3 3187527
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-05(E).
790 $a 0089
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1591647