東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democrat...

Ma, Ka-Fai.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democratization in Hong Kong, 1984-1994.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democratization in Hong Kong, 1984-1994./
作者:	Ma, Ka-Fai.
面頁冊數:	268 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-09, Section: A, page: 4155.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International57-09A.
標題:	Social structure. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9703666
ISBN:	9780591145977

To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democratization in Hong Kong, 1984-1994.
Ma, Ka-Fai.

To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democratization in Hong Kong, 1984-1994. - 268 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-09, Section: A, page: 4155.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1996.

Three historically-specific questions are taken up by this dissertation: First, why and how did Britain and China in 1984 attempt to articulate a political agenda to deal with uncertainties related to the transfer of sovereignty in 1997? Second, how and from whom did this agenda win its support and resistance? Third, why and how did the institutionalization of political stability first work and then fail in 1994? This dissertation tries to provide an analysis of the political economy of Hong Kong and to examine the linkage between that political economy and the political stability and crises which marked the years between 1984 and 1994.

ISBN: 9780591145977Subjects--Topical Terms:

528995
Social structure.

To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democratization in Hong Kong, 1984-1994.
LDR:03029nmm a2200301 4500 001 2072178
005 20160723162032.5
008 170521s1996 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780591145977
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9703666
035 $a AAI9703666
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ma, Ka-Fai. $3 3187361
245 1 0 $a To kowtow or not to kowtow? Democratization in Hong Kong, 1984-1994.
300 $a 268 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-09, Section: A, page: 4155.
500 $a Supervisor: Joel Rogers.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1996.
520 $a Three historically-specific questions are taken up by this dissertation: First, why and how did Britain and China in 1984 attempt to articulate a political agenda to deal with uncertainties related to the transfer of sovereignty in 1997? Second, how and from whom did this agenda win its support and resistance? Third, why and how did the institutionalization of political stability first work and then fail in 1994? This dissertation tries to provide an analysis of the political economy of Hong Kong and to examine the linkage between that political economy and the political stability and crises which marked the years between 1984 and 1994.
520 $a The answers outlined in this project point to the significance of class forces. A relative class power approach is employed to explore the factors that generated cooperation between Britain and China and led to the signing of the Joint Declaration which offered an optimistic promise for the democracy of the post-1997 Hong Kong. It aims at demonstrating how different class actors in Hong Kong reacted to the Joint Declaration and the subsequent process of democratization, who supported, who opposed, and who compromised. It examines the conflicts among local class forces and the contribution of these conflicts to the crisis of political stability. Conflicts existed not only among segments of divided economic elite but also among organizations of labor. The content of these conflicts was both economic and political, structural and strategic, and any of them must, therefore, be both analytic and narrative.
520 $a In addition, the project provides a story-telling narrative which accounts for what happened as what might have happened, given that a theory may lead to the rediscovery of the opportunities that were lost, possibilities that were inherent at each juncture and alternatives that remain open. It points out that three opportunities that Britain lost in generating a serious project of democracy in Hong Kong. It also discusses the potential source of new opportunity by looking at the tensions between Chinese state-owned capitals and the Chinese regime.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Social structure. $3 528995
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
690 $a 0700
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $3 626640
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 57-09A.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9703666