東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Abstract thinking and thought in anc...

Moser, David James.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Abstract thinking and thought in ancient Chinese and early Greek.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Abstract thinking and thought in ancient Chinese and early Greek./
作者:	Moser, David James.
面頁冊數:	243 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06, Section: A, page: 2457.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International57-06A.
標題:	Ancient languages. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9635576

Abstract thinking and thought in ancient Chinese and early Greek.
Moser, David James.

Abstract thinking and thought in ancient Chinese and early Greek. - 243 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06, Section: A, page: 2457.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 1996.

Many studies in comparative philosophy have noted that Chinese philosophy did not concern itself with abstractions to the same extent as did the Greek tradition. While Plato and Aristotle dealt extensively with definitions of abstract terms and theories of abstract universals, the contemporaneous pre-Qin Chinese thinkers showed a general indifference to such questions. The Chinese language, with its lack of morphological features, had no way of marking abstract nouns, and many sinologists have speculated that this aspect of the language may have hindered abstract thinking in China. This study examines the way in which abstractions are handled in both ancient Greek and classical Chinese, and surveys theories of language in the ancient Greek and Chinese texts in order to explore how aspects of the two languages may have had an effect on their approaches to abstraction. It is shown that differences in the way information is handled in the early Chinese and Greek languages may have had an effect on the degree of meta-linguistic awareness of the Chinese thinkers; specifically, the highly-inflected nature of Greek may have served to focus cognitive attention to the semantic domain of abstractions, whereas for the Chinese the existence of such a class of abstractions was less salient. Evidence from discussions of language in Plato and Aristotle are compared with the theory of language expounded in the pre-Qin Neo-Mohist Canon to study differences in the way the two philosophical traditions treated abstract entities. It is concluded that, while the two different language typologies (inflectional vs. isolating) represented by Greek and Chinese do not effect thinking (low-level cognition), differences in the degree of meta-linguistic awareness they afford speakers can have significant effects on thought (philosophical orientation, theories of language, abstract theorizing, etc.).Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122823
Ancient languages.

Abstract thinking and thought in ancient Chinese and early Greek.
LDR:02755nmm a2200277 4500 001 2072143
005 20160723162026.5
008 170521s1996 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9635576
035 $a AAI9635576
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moser, David James. $3 3187331
245 1 0 $a Abstract thinking and thought in ancient Chinese and early Greek.
300 $a 243 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06, Section: A, page: 2457.
500 $a Chair: Donald Munro.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 1996.
520 $a Many studies in comparative philosophy have noted that Chinese philosophy did not concern itself with abstractions to the same extent as did the Greek tradition. While Plato and Aristotle dealt extensively with definitions of abstract terms and theories of abstract universals, the contemporaneous pre-Qin Chinese thinkers showed a general indifference to such questions. The Chinese language, with its lack of morphological features, had no way of marking abstract nouns, and many sinologists have speculated that this aspect of the language may have hindered abstract thinking in China. This study examines the way in which abstractions are handled in both ancient Greek and classical Chinese, and surveys theories of language in the ancient Greek and Chinese texts in order to explore how aspects of the two languages may have had an effect on their approaches to abstraction. It is shown that differences in the way information is handled in the early Chinese and Greek languages may have had an effect on the degree of meta-linguistic awareness of the Chinese thinkers; specifically, the highly-inflected nature of Greek may have served to focus cognitive attention to the semantic domain of abstractions, whereas for the Chinese the existence of such a class of abstractions was less salient. Evidence from discussions of language in Plato and Aristotle are compared with the theory of language expounded in the pre-Qin Neo-Mohist Canon to study differences in the way the two philosophical traditions treated abstract entities. It is concluded that, while the two different language typologies (inflectional vs. isolating) represented by Greek and Chinese do not effect thinking (low-level cognition), differences in the degree of meta-linguistic awareness they afford speakers can have significant effects on thought (philosophical orientation, theories of language, abstract theorizing, etc.).
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Ancient languages. $3 2122823
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0289
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $3 777416
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 57-06A.
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9635576